November 2008 Archives

    Tom Cable is through as Raiders coach after this season -- has to be. That bonehead fake field goal he tried in the second quarter has to be the end. It resulted in a Chiefs' TD because Shane Lechler was directed to shove  the ball between his legs -- he dropped it -- to Sebastian Janikowski who was supposed to run -- get this -- 18 yards for a first down. I don't know if Seabass even can run 18 yards, certainly not fast enough. Cable said the play worked in practice. Great.

    So Cable was too clever for his own good, the mark of a desperate coach, the mark of a bad coach.

    Nice knowing you, Tom.

    If you want to read my full column on the demise of Cable and the trouble with JaMarcus Russell click here.

     

    Oh, one other thing about tonight's horrendous loss by the Warriors in NY. It concerns Al Harrington, the guy Don Nelson ran out of Oakland, the guy Nelson disrespected, the guy Nelson said could not rebound.

    Harrington had 12 rebounds against the Warriors.

    Harrington scored 36 points.

    Not bad for a guy who can't play.

    You'd think out of sheer pride Nelson would have devised a way to stop him. What gives? 

    I need to be careful about this. I need to be careful because I'm going to criticize Don Nelson for his coaching during the Warriors/Knicks game, and I wasn't there so what I write may be limited or even wrong. I need to be careful because I've known Nelson forever and admire him, I really do, but I'm still going to criticize him.

    I was watching the game with my kid Iggy who flies back to UCLA tomorrow. At the very end we noticed the same thing. There was still time left in the game, say 10 seconds, but Nelson got up from the bench, turned around and walked through the exit into the tunnel away from the court by himself. I could be wrong. Maybe it was someone who looked like Nelson, but I sure thought it was Nelson.

    What's the problem with him walking out? The game wasn't over. His players had to stay on the court or on the bench. If they had to face up to the humiliation of a 138-125 loss to the mediocre Knicks, if they had to face up to oh-for-five on their roadtrip, Nelson sure had to face up also. By leaving -- if he left -- he was separating himself from the loss. He was saying, in effect, that the team had let him down and he was disgusted.

    This is not how a coach acts, especially a coach who had complicity in all the losses, especially in the Knicks loss. For reasons beyond my comprehension Nelson insisted on playing his "smallball" even when it became obvious his shrimp lineup could not defend the Knicks. A creative coach -- and Nelson is the height of creative -- would have done something to stop the Knicks. I mean the Knicks ran a pick and roll on almost every possession in the second half, but the Warriors did not have enough big guys to defend the rim. This was inexcusable. It was inexcusable that the Warriors did not know how to stop a pick and roll, one of the rudimentary maneuvers in basketball.

    The third quarter was telling. The Warriors had trailed by more than 20 points, but they fought their way back with Andris Biedrins at center and Anthony Randolph at power forward -- in other words, with a traditional NBA lineup. When they cut the lead to 10, Nelson removed Randolph for Kelenna Azubuike. Corey Maggette had to move to power forward, a position he can't play, and the lead soared back to 20. Why did Nelson do that? I don't know. Maybe he had a reason but I can't ask because I wasn't in New York.

    It seemed weird to me. It also seemed weird when he walked off the court and left his team flat.

    The past two seasons the Warriors were the most exciting pro team in the Bay Area. There was a feeling of something unique happening at Oracle Arena. Fans got behind the team. And now this.


    The Warriors are boring bordering on unwatchable. The Warriors brass may be deluding themselves on this topic but you know it's true. The Warriors make you want to fall asleep.

    There are reasons:

    No Baron Davis

    No Monta Ellis

    The mere presence of Corey Maggette

    No power forward

    No teamwork.

    This no teamwork thing is a very big deal. Did you happen to watch the Warriors vs. Cleveland on Friday night? On numerous occasions one of the Warriors dribbled the ball down the length of the court and then shot the ball -- often a 3-point shot. Often he missed. On those occasions the Warriors never threw a single pass. This is bad basketball. Call it disgusting.

    Maggette, of course, is the worst offender. He gets the ball, he shoots. It's as if he's playing his own one-on-one game in a team game. He is a terrible acquistion and he makes the heart long for Baron Davis, whom the Warriors ran off.

    I can't believe the Warriors charge money to watch this bad team. Owner Chris Cohan should be ashamed.

    First thing this morning I went online to read the latest sports news. In addition to a sports columnist I've become a sports blogamist and I'm always looking for stuff. And what did I see? "Sources: Burress wounded in accidental shooting":

    Now, this seemed interesting for a blog so I read on. The article said Giants receiver Burress suffered an accidental gunshot wound Friday night in a club. It went on to say the receiver accidentally shot himself in the leg.

    Right off, I felt suspicious, like someone might have been spinning the news. I mean, Burress accidentally shot himself. How? Oh, I see. He naturally had a gun New York being the Wild West and all that and he felt an itch on his leg. Trying to scratch the itch he somehow put his finger on the trigger of said gun and somehow pulled the trigger. It all makes perfect sense.

    Give me a break. There has to be more to the story. And here's what I want to know anyway. What kind of club was he at -- and in more general terms, what kinds of clubs do these pro athletes frequent? Don't the bouncers frisk them on the way in and tell them to leave their guns in the coat room? And why did Burress have a gun in the first place -- if it was his gun?

    He must live in a mighty dangerous world. Or maybe his reality is so different from yours and mine, it's incomprehensible.

    Way to go, Plaxico.

    It's being reported that Lane Kiffin will become coach of the Tennessee Volunteers at the conclusion of this season. Good for Kiffin.

    Now for some advice. The guy needs to grow up. He ruined things in Oakland by shooting off his mouth in a juvenile way -- it wasn't necessary. Al Davis had every reason to fire this 13-year-old for his bad behavior, although I doubt Al can withold Kiffin's money.

    I've also heard that Kiffin alienated many good people at the Raiders with his general arrogance and by pretending he invented football.

    If Kiffin doesn't want to get run out of Tennessee he needs to grow up fast.

    You can say anything you want about the Warriors. They miss Monta Ellis and wasn't that a bad break? Don Nelson should use Ronny Turiaf more. Corey Maggette is incredibly one dimensional and highly selfish. The Warriors should play more/less smallball. You can say all of that.

    But there is only one thing to be said. The Warriors need Baron Davis. As I write this on Friday afternoon their record is 5-10. That stinks. With Davis they would have a winning record -- and I don't care how bad he's playing with the Clippers. With the freedom Nelson gave him he'd be leading this team to a respectable record, and the Warriors would be exciting and that's the truth.

    The Warriors almost certainly will not make the playoffs this season. With Davis they would stand a decent chance.

    Whoever decided not to keep him -- hello, R. Rowell -- made a massive miscalculation, a grotesque miscalculation. The Warriors ruined their team by letting Davis go, turned it from a contender to a bottom feeder. You know it. I know it.

    That's all anyone needs to say.

    When the Warriors made a run at the Celtics Wednesday night, Ronny Turiaf was playing power forward and Andris Biedrins was at center. In other words, the Warriors were playing a traditional lineup with two big men. This kind of lineup must be uninteresting to Don Nelson who loves to put four midgets and a center out there, but it was effective.

    So I want to propose something. I propose that Nelson should use this lineup more often:

    Jamal Crawford

    Stephen Jackson

    Corey Maggette

    Ronny Turiaf

    Andris Biedrins

    The two big guys give the Warriors good interior defense and solid rebounding. It's true Turiaf can't score but the Warriors don't need him to score as the other four are good scorers. I can't see anyone else on the team who should start at power forward over Turiaf. Until now Brandan Wright has been much too soft inside. He went for a dunk in traffic last night and almost got blasted out of the building. Then Nelson took him out.

    When Monta Ellis gets back the Warriors can have a backcourt of Ellis and Crawford. It is a good scoring backcourt although neither is a defensive whiz. Maggette can become the sixth man. He would be good at that, instant offense and all that. He is not a good starter because he hogs the ball, almost never passes and throws crummy passes when he tries. He never makes anyone else better -- he's a free-lancer in a team sport. So he could be the sixth man.

    On this Thanksgiving day that's what I think about the Warriors.

     

    This is Iggy, back from L.A., writing in my dad's office about the Warriors.

    I bet you a nickel the Warriors trade for a power forward this year if:

    1. Monta Ellis comes back healthy

    2. The team is competitive, but not quite good enough to make the playoffs this year.

    In 08'- 09', Power Forward is the Warriors weakest spot on the court. The Warriors want to win now and it's obvious because instead of conserving cap space, they gave long term contracts to Stephen Jackson and Corey Maggette, plus they extended Don Nelson, the last guy you'd hire to groom young talent.

    This team needs a veteran power forward better than Corey Maggette. If they can upgrade that position this year by trading Maggette and Brandan Wright or Anthony Randolph or both, they're going to do it. Then, they'll be locked in for around the 5th seed in the West for the next three or four years. They'll never win in the playoffs, but Robert Rowell will think of clever marketing schemes to squeeze the most money out of his overly-loyal fan base, and Don Nelson will break the record for all-time wins.

    I bet you a nickel this happens.

    Got an email from Jason Jenkins at the 49ers saying Alex Smith declined my request for an interview. I respect that, but I don't understand it. Alex and I get along well and the questions I intended to ask were fairly softball.

    My son Iggy, just home from UCLA, said Smith's agent probably advised him not to speak to the media. Perhaps.

    I wonder what you think. Why is Smith unwilling to give me and all other reporters an interview? Please help me understand this. But please don't resort to reporters are jerks, parasites, etc. That's too simple and it's wrong. Alex and the media always got along well. That's why I'm confused.

    Since I'm not going to speak to Alex, I want to take this chance to wish him a happy Thanksgiving and a speedy recovery.

    We're beginning to hear about Michael Vick. It was in the news that he's entered a guilty plea and that could speed up his release from the slammer and that means he may be able to start his football career sooner than later.

    Where do I go to vomit?

    There should be no football career for this felon. Let him go away. Let him hide under a rock. Let us never hear of him again. Let us never hear how he's rehabilitated and he's a different man and he's become a regular dog lover. It all will be a public relations campaign, anyway. What he did stinks and when people act like he acted they need to exit the stage and never come back.

    No one owes him a career in the NFL. He forfeited that when he acted like a monster. Any team that takes him -- I hope none does -- will be making a tragic mistake.

    Ira Miller, dean of NFL writers,  just phoned. As I've told you he lives outside Chicago these days and he was on his way to O'Hare to pick up friends from Berkeley who are spending Thanksgiving with him and his wife Sharon. He said he was stuck in traffic and decided to call me.

    "What did you think of the Raiders on Sunday?" he asked.

    I said they were pretty good -- surprisingly good. He asked if I think this is the beginning of something and I said I don't know, but they should beat Kansas City and that would be -- be still my heart -- a two-game win streak.

    "If Cable does well, he might keep the job," Ira said.

    I said maybe.

    "But it won't matter," Ira said.

    And I knew what he meant. The coach is not the Raiders' problem, not their primary problem by a long shot. Until Al Davis wises up or gives up control there will be losing coach after losing coach -- they could have Bill Walsh and he'd lose over there. The coach is irrelevant.

    That's what Ira meant.

     

    Yesterday I sent an email to the 49ers asking for an interview with Alex Smith. Jason Jenkins heads public relations down there and he's a whiz. Jason wrote back and said Smith has declined all interviews since he went on Injured Reserve but Jason said he'd ask Alex anyway. So, I'm waiting, but I don't have much hope.

    I want to ask Smith what he's doing these days and how he perceives his future. Smith is a good guy as far as I can tell and he answers honestly. This must be a tough time for him, not knowing if he'll ever be well enough to play, hearing everyone call him a bust.

    Last week, I asked Jason for time with Mike Singletary. I want to interview Singletary about the large notebook he carries around with him. Singletary keeps a running diary of what happens to him in a day. Jason said Singletary would prefer to meet me after Thanksgiving. That's the problem. I made my request before the Niners lost to Dallas. I expect them to lose at Buffalo. Somehow a column and a blog on Singletary's notebook won't seem appropriate with the team down the tubes and Singletary on the verge of unemployment. In life timing is everything.

    Woke up this morning, grabbed the papers and read two different articles on new Warrior Jamal Crawford. And had to laugh.

    One article said he's glad to be with the Warriors and happy to be out of the New York Knicks "soap opera." The other article said he's glad to be with the Warriors and happy to be out of Knicks "circus."

    Well, excuse me, but does anyone in his/her right mind put forward the Warriors as a paragon of stability? And, come on, aren't the Warriors the essence of soap opera and circus?

    I mean, you have the team president horning in on the general manager, stealing his power, attacking him frontally to the media. You have team president signing Stephen Jax to a longterm extension apparently without the input of GM -- a crummy move by the way. You have president getting in the way of deal to keep Baron Davis in Oakland. You have president bringing the hammer down on Monta Ellis against the wishes of GM.

    You have the head coach's No.1 guy suddenly inserted into the GM's office. You can interpret this many ways, but one way is he's a plant from the coach -- as in coach's operative.

    If you go with this theory, you have coach grabbing GM's power while he pretends to be friends with GM.

    You have coach not playing GM's players like Marcus Williams and Brandan Wright and Marco Belinelli.

    So, if this doesn't qualify as a soap opera and a circus I don't know what does. Welcome to the Golden State Warriors, Jamal.

    Here are some excerpts from Tom Cable's Monday news conference:

     

    Q: Does the victory over Denver enhance his chances to get the head coaching job full time?

     
    A: I think about the Kansas City Chiefs. I don't think it's fair to get into that right now. That stuff is going to take care of itself. Truthfully, I'm not worried about it. If we continue the path we're on and continue to move forward, the right things will happen. Worrying about all that other stuff would take away from this team, and I'm never going to do that.

    Q: Will he be a candidate for Raiders head coach next season if he continues to do well now?

     

    A: Oh, probably. I probably would be the head coach if we continue to do well. But, again, that's not the issue. Right now Kansas City is the issue.

     

    Q: Has his team turned a corner with the Denver win?

     

    A: Well, I feel like they responded the way you want them to as a coach. I think they embraced the rivalry, embraced what that means in terms of competition within the division. In terms of turning turning the corner I think you have to answer that after next Sunday. To me, you win a game, it makes you feel good. You win two games, now you can start to believe. That's the approach we're taking this week. This is a huge game for us, just like Denver was.

     

    Q: McFadden lobbied hard for the TD play?

     

    A: Actually that was his call. We were down there and he said to me, "If you give it to me out of the formation where I can get it, I can get it into the endzone."

     

    Q: How often do you listen to the players?

     

    A: I've always kind of been like that. When you're in the flow of the game it's good to listen to them. It also too is part of his growth to me. After he scored, I said, "You became a pro today. To make a call and then to go do what you said you would do, that's a big step."

     

    Q: You're only 3-8. Do you still talk to the team about the chance to catch the leaders and win the division?

     

    A: I think you have to. I mean, until they say it's not possible that's why we come to work. So we still go for it. Kansas City is the next one, it's another rivalry, there's a tremendous amount of tradition between Kansas City and the Oakland Raiders and we want to be a part of that and that means finding a way to win a game Sunday.

     

    Q: Can you pinpoint why it's happening now and not earlier?

     

    A: I think you have to change a mindset, the culture of losing. Everybody's got good players in the National Football League. We're no different. But what's between your ears is what matters at this level. I think just trying to get everybody to believe the same things and play for the same things, that really is how the good teams do it. There's been a lot made of what the New York Giants started out doing last year with their struggles and their getting ready to let Coughlin go and blah blah blah. It's been great having Gibril Wilson here because he kind of gives you some feedback what that was like, that rough start. And they wound up winning the Super Bowl. You never know what it's going to be but I know this: If you get them all pulling the same direction good things happen.

     

    Q: What was the psyche of the players when you got hired?

     

    A: We were very high and low, very peak and valley-like. (I want us) climbing the hill together and not (having) those falls. We've had some falls since I've taken over. The first half at Baltimore, the second half at New Orleans, the Atlanta game. I put my finger on those right there. It's just get them to trust each other, pull for each other because great things will happen if we do that and we proved that yesterday.

    I was on the radio with Murph and Mac the other day, and they asked me if Mike Singletary will be a good coach of the 49ers and become their fulltime coach. I said I didn't know. It was too early to tell.

    Well, we know a little more now. He could beat the crummy Rams but was nowhere against the Cowboys. So I want to phrase the initial question a little differently. What does this team really need?

    If you ask it that way Singletary's future is down on the list of needs. The team needs someone at the top, someone experienced in football like Bill Parcells, someone who can make over an entire organization.

    If you look at it like that, this new person -- football czar -- would bring in his own people. That means he'd bring in a new general manager, new coach, the works. A new czar would want his own coach and that coach almost certainly would not be Singletary.

    The czar also would want his own GM. And that GM almost certainly would not be Scot McCloughan. Toward the end of Sunday's game, Joe Starkey said on the radio that the Cowboys simply have a better roster than the 49ers. He was right. Who's responsbible for the talent gap? McCloughan along with Mike Nolan, that's who. Would someone please show me what McCloughan has done that merits continued service with the Niners after this season? I really want to know.

    A discerning reader of the Zohn just pointed out that I: picked the Cardinal to win Big Game and said Toby Gerhart would be the best running back on the field.

    I was wrong and wrong.

    After I'm done filing my column, I will spend the rest of the night repenting.

    It's about a half hour before Big Game and I'm in Memorial Stadium and I have something to say about the phrase "bragging rights" as it relates to Cal and Stanford. It is the most boring, most over-used cliche in sports writing. (Sorry, I don't know how to put the accent mark over the e in cliche.)

    Any reporter sitting down the row from me in the press box who uses bragging rights today should immediately have his/her laptop confiscated for a week for dereliction of duty.

    Other cliches that never should be allowed ever again in sports journalism are, in no particular order:

    For this game, you can throw the records out the window.

    He carried the ball like a loaf of bread.

    Hardnosed.

    Lunch pail player:

    Blue collar athlete

    He lost his focus.

    He plays them one game at a time.

    He lost his concentration.

    After such and such event, he learned what's really important in life.

    He has upside.

    He's not only a great athlete, he's a character guy.

    They got the crowd into it.

    After the game, they thanked the fans.

    They're moving left to right across the dial.

    So and So was running downhill all day.

    And of course, forbidden is -- Cal and Stanford were playing for bragging rights in the Bay Area.

     

     

    A day after the Warriors obtained Jamal Crawford:

    1. The Warriors actually may make the playoffs. I always thought this would be a rebuilding year but Crawford is a bigtime scorer and, if Monta Ellis ever returns 100 percent, the Warriors will have a dynamite backcourt.

    2. They can make the playoffs but they won't be a high seed and they'll probably go out early in the postseason. In other words, this is a typical Don Nelson team. Small ball. Low expectations. Any progress implies Nelson is a genius and gets the most out of the least. This is the position Nelson always has been most comfortable with.

    3. Certain Warriors never catch a break. This was supposed to be a breakout year for Brandan Wright and he's still just a bench guy. Ditto for Marco Belinelli. Marcus Williams ought to be history soon. No place for him on the team.

    4. I'm at Big Game. Talk to you later.

     

    I promised my wife I'd take her to the movies, so I'm writing this in a hurry before I dash away.

    Getting Jamal Crawford is very good work by the Warriors -- I assume this is Chris Mullin's work. They got Crawford, as far as I can tell, straight up for Al Harrington. Harrington was done in Oakland and never would have played much for the Warriors ever again. So, in a sense, the Warriors traded someone dead in the water for a really good player.

    Crawford is not necessarily a floor leader but he scores -- he's averaging almost 20 this season. And while Monta Eliis is gone, the Warriors need a scoring presence in the backcourt. When Ellis comes back -- and if he still is good -- the Warriors will have a nifty backcourt, Ellis and Crawford. Very nice. Very exciting.

     

    The Warriors' Anthony Morrow is quite the phenomenon. One local newspaper ran a column about him a few days ago. Today another newspaper group ran a blowout about Morrow including categories like: Shooting, Smarts, Passion and Athleticism. Surprise, he's good at all of them.

    Looking at the blowout you'd think this guy is a savior. You'd think he's Michael Jordan.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but Morrow has started two games. He's played very well and shows promise. But I repeat -- two games. And on the basis of two games he deserves all this?

    You know darn well some players come into the NBA and start off well and flame out after the league figures them out. So I advise some restraint before we anoint Morrow the second-coming of Chris Mullin.

    I put in Mullin's name by way of transition and for a specific reason. If Morrow turns out to be a real star, who gets the credit? This is an important question because at the Warriors these days Robert Rowell and Don Nelson are getting lots of credit and Mullin is getting lots of blame.

    Did Nelson discover Morrow? I don't think so. Nelson was sitting on his veranda in Maui.

    Did Rowell discover Morrow? I don't think so. Rowell was sitting on his you know what in Oakland.

    Mullin discovered Morrow. Credit where credit is due.

    I am glad Brian Sabean survived. When the new guy took over for Peter Magowan there was talk Sabean would get fired. He hasn't done well lately and no one would have argued loudly with a firing. But Sabean has been handicapped by the post-Bonds fallout. I believe he is a good general manager and is intent on creating a winner. I also think Billy Beane is a good GM but I'm not so sure how intent he is on creating a winner and after the Holliday signing we need to see much more to take him seriously.

    The Giants need to give Sabean one more season to show he's leading the team in the right direction. After that the Giants can make an informed decision on Sabean, yes or no.

    Beane is in no danger of getting fired. He's a part owner.

    I just read Matt Maiocco's terrific blog on Mike Martz and I came away with this.

    Martz insists Shaun Hill was not ready to be the starter in training camp or early in the season and that's why Martz chose J.T. O'Sullivan as the starter. Listening to Martz spin all this, you'd think, "Sure Martz made the right decision starting JTO. Everyone needed to wait for Hill to grow up as a QB."

    To that I say baloney. It was evident last season that Hill could manage a game -- and he always could manage one better than Mr. Butter Fingers JTO. Martz is trying to make it seem he (Martz) always was on top of things. Well, he wasn't. He foisted the wrong QB off on the Niners and now he's covering his butt, pretending he knew what he was doing all along. Don't pull a fast one, Mike.

    I have to hand it to Mike Martz. He has not always been thrilling as 49er offensive coordinator, but he sure got his yah yahs out criticizing the officials for that how they handled the clock at the end of the Arizona game and for how they didn't give the Niner coaches adequate info on where the ball would be spotted.

    Martz said the officials screwed the 49ers. Usually coaches are circumspect because they're afraid of getting fined 20 big ones. Martz got fined 20 big ones, but I appreciate one coach telling the truth, telling it as he sees it. Of course, it's easy for me to speak. I'm not 20 grand poorer.

    On the other hand, Martz has a history of inept clock management. One can't help but wonder if this is another example of that and if, in fact, he spent $20,000 to deflect the blame.

    Just got off the phone with Murph and Mac on KNBR and I have something to admit. I'm a late sleeper, so I got out of bed after 8:00 a.m. and grabbed a cup of coffee and walked downstairs to my office just in time for the call from the producer.

    Which means I was sitting in my pajamas and slippers while I talked to Murph and Mac about Mike Singletary, Scot McCloughan, Mike Martz, etc. I was sitting in my pajamas while a whole group of KNBR faithful were listening to me and maybe even taking me seriously. And I was thinking, "This is the life."

    Years ago when I worked for the SF paper I did a regular Thursday spot with Ralph in the afternoon on KNBR -- got paid 50 bucks a shot in case you're wondering. It was late in the day and by then I had changed into my clothes.

    I'll be on with Murph and Mac Thursday at 8:32 a.m. Hope you can listen.

    Brian Murphy, as some of you know, is an alum of the Press Democrat. He did a wonderful job covering the Niners for us -- broke the story that Seifert was out and Mariucci was in. He and I are friends and my kid Iggy, then aged 8 (I think), danced like a fiend at the wedding of Murph and Candace while Murph stood there chanting, "Go, Iggy. Go, Iggy."

    I just sent in my Thursday column about the numerous football sins of Mike Martz. I had planned to write a shorter version for the Zohn but I have a better plan.

    Most of the ideas I used came from reader Shane Buettner, a former Bay Area resident who now lives in Seattle. FYI, he's the editor-in-chief of Home Theater Magazine. So here's Shane's email that got me going in the first place. He said I could use his ideas in my column for which I thank him.

    Shane's original email to me:

    I'm very surprised that the wounds inflicted on the 2008 49ers by Mike Martz aren't a bigger story than they've been. Martz elevated the third best QB on the team to starter in JTO, and compounded that problem by running an offense the team was totally unsuited to run that was pass happy and relied on late developing, long pass plays that simply gave JTO more time to bungle a play. Frank Gore is the best player on the team, and yet Martz has marginalized him in favor of his own preferences.

    I suppose one could blame Nolan for not being strong enough to put Martz in check as Singletary has done, but really, Martz did a lot of the shoveling for that hole the team has been in this entire year and one could make a case he should have been sent packing with Nolan.

    --Shane

     

    Yesterday I posted a blog about Kwame Harris and in that blog I mentioned my all-time favorite Bay Area athletes. I somehow omitted Bob Brenly, great guy. He goes on the list.

    I also included a quick list of my all-time least favorite Bay Area athletes, although I somehow left out John Montefusco. So here's to you, John. You're one of my all-time least favorite Bay Area athletes.

    But this is about Joe Morgan. A few Zohn readers wondered why I included him on my all-time least-favorite list and one reader wondered if it's because Morgan is "arrogant." Let me start by saying, yes, I think he's arrogant. You can hear it on his broadcasts. He's a know-it-all and, I believe, he is locked into his point of view which he thinks is the only point of view. And he's uninterested in other points of view. But that's no big deal. Many athletes are that way.

    Before I get into why Morgan is one of my all-time least favorites I want to make something clear. I am not saying Morgan is a bad person. He seems like a good citizen and he's quite intelligent and I assume he's a decent man. I just don't like him and he sure doesn't like me. A few weeks ago we passed each other at a shopping center, looked each other in the eye but never acknowledged each other even though we've been acquainted the better part of three decades. I'm sure if you asked Morgan about me he'd have a lot to say.

    But this is my blog, not his. I phoned him one day, years ago, when he was on the road. I said I wanted to ask him a baseball question. He said he was in a production meeting for a game broadcast and I should call him back in an hour. When I called back he said, as I recall, "I'm not talking to you."

    That came as a surprise. "Why?" I asked.

    "Because you wrote something bad about me."

    I very well may have been critical of Morgan -- I criticize lots of people -- and if he didn't want to talk to me that was his business. But I didn't actually remember writing anything bad about him, so I said, "Gee, Joe, what did I write?"

    Now came the defining moment, the surreal moment -- and, hey, I don't think I was hallucinating. Unless I was temporarily insane, this really took place. I had asked why he wouldn't speak to me and Morgan said, "I don't know what you wrote, but my cleaning lady read the article and she said it was critical and I shouldn't speak to you anymore."

    That was the last time I ever spoke to Joe Morgan, but I've thought a lot about that last conversation and that cleaning lady. If I had decided to cut someone dead for life I would take a few minutes to actually read the offensive column. I would want to know what I was talking about and why I disliked the guy on the phone. I wouldn't leave it to the cleaning lady.

    But I'm probably all wrong. Maybe this cleaning lady is a genius. Maybe while she dusts the furniture she also reads every article written about Morgan and grades them and then she tells Morgan who's in and who's out. If this is the case, Morgan's cleaning lady is a phenomenon and whatever he's paying her isn't enough.

    So here's what I conclude. I don't like Morgan but I think his cleaning lady is the tops.

    I post this comment with trepidation because I know how much this guy -- currently my favorite Bay Area athlete -- is despised. But here it is.

    I like Kwame Harris. I really like Kwame Harris.

    In the past I've had other favorite Bay Area athletes. Dusty Baker was one. Dusty is a known great guy. Steve Young is another. They make my all-time list of favorite Bay Area athletes along with Jeffrey Leonard and Kevin Mitchell and Keith Fahnhorst and Chris Mullin and Dave Stewart and Johnnie LeMaster.

    (Of course there's a list of my all-time least favorite athletes. Quickly and off the top of my head -- Jose Canseco, Joe Morgan, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, Mike LaCoss, Barry Bonds, Ted Hendricks.)

    But back to Kwame. I am not asserting he is a great or even good left tackle. Lately he hasn't even been adequate. He knows that. Interim Cable correctly considered benching Kwame but the backup was even worse, so Kwame holds onto his job by default. And remember, left tackle is vital. He protects the blind side of the quarterback and Kwame has not been protecting very well. He's OK on run plays but on pass plays he often false starts and that ruins plays, or he gets beat by the pass rusher -- maybe Kwame has poor balance or reacts slowly. I'm not an expert. But I sit in the press box and watch him with my binoculars and see him get beat. So, I'm not defending his play although in the interest of full disclosure I root for him to improve.

    I like each guy I named because they are nice guys and highly interesting guys -- every one of them. They also treat me like a human being although I admit I am part of an inferior species called Sportswritercus Americanus.

    Kwame fits into the nice/interesting guy category. I wrote a profile of him during training camp -- it didn't sugarcoat things, explained this may be his last chance. But I also told how he's a serious piano player and was an English major at Stanford, etc. The next time I was around the Raiders Kwame sought me out and thanked me for the article. He even shook my hand. That was the first time a professional athlete ever thanked me for something I wrote. But, hey, I've only been doing this job 30 years so I'm a mere beginner.

    After Raiders games, usually losses, Kwame chats as long as I want even if he stunk out the joint. Sometimes we talk about the game -- "How did we look from up there?" he once asked sheepishly. "Not very good," I said.

    Sometimes we talk about books we're reading or what we thought of California when we arrived from back East -- he's from Delaware. "The first time I drove on 280, it blew me away. It was so beautiful," he said. He is charming and polite and warm and heartbreakingly sincere and he actually looks me in the eye and asks questions about me as if I really am a person.

    So, you bet I like Kwame and pull for Kwame. If you knew him you would too.

     

    Tough to say if he should get the permanent job. He's done good things. The offense is playing better. He and Mike Martz seem to function together. The players are spirited and play hard. Compare him to Tom Cable, the interim across the Bay and there's no comparison. Cable was DOA, and Singletary has life.

    But Singletary has won only one game and that was against the Rams, a team that should be run out of the league for sheer incompetence. Next week in Dallas we'll get a better barometer of where the Niners really are at and how good Singletary is. He is an imposing man but imposing does not always translate into wins. We'll see.

    One criticism of him is unfair. People say the 49ers should have a head coach who's an offensive coach. That way they won't be up the creek if the offensive coordinator leaves -- as has happened in the past. Well, teams need both offensive and defensive coordinators. And I want to remind you George Seifert was a defensive guy and the team did pretty well under him.

    Saturday at Big Game, Toby Gerhart will be the best running back on the field for Stanford and Cal.

    He is a stocky tough fullback type, but he's also fast and elusive and plays tailback. When he was in high school Stanford was eager to get him. Cal didn't know he existed. And that was the end of Cal as far as he was concerned.

    USC offered him a scholarship, but as a fullback. Gerhard said no dice. Also the Trojans said he couldn't play baseball. Double no dice. Gerhart is a power-hitting outfielder on the Stanford team, and the only two Pac-10 schools who would let him play both sports were UCLA and Stanford.

    He still does not know if he wants to pursue a pro football or baseball career. After being hurt early last baseball season, he batted .325 in his last 20 games and he homered in the College World Series.

    He's likely to run all over Cal in a Big Game Stanford can win -- should win.

    What's wrong with the press release the Warriors sent out an hour ago? Here's a brief excerpt:

    "The Golden State Warriors have signed guard/forward Stephen Jackson to a contract extension, the team announced today. 'We're excited to have Stephen under contract for the next several years,' said Warriors President Robert Rowell.' "

    So, what's wrong? Let me count the ways.

    1. Jackson is 30 and his body is a little used up and this is not a smart use of money. If the Warriors were interested in giving a veteran a longterm deal they should have given it to Baron Davis, a real difference maker.

    2. The quote in this release is from Robert Rowell and it's not from Chris Mullin. Excuse me, but I always thought the general manager announced trades, apparently not at the Warriors. This is further evidence of Rowell horning in on Mullin's domain and taking it over. I don't know this but I'd bet the mortgage Rowell negotiated directly with Jackson and cut Mullin out of the negotiations.

    3. This is further evidence of deep trouble in Warriorland. And excuse me for being blunt, but who the heck is Robert Rowell?

     

     

    Here'e a revealing exchange about Mike Singletary and Mike Martz. After the Niners beat the Rams, I asked Singletary what changed for the offense in the second half. After all, the 49ers scored 35 points in the first half but got shut out in the second.

     

    "In the second half we had a little bit of, 'Let's make sure we protect the lead,' " Singletary said. "At the same time, 'Let's make sure we don't turn the ball over.' I think Mike Martz did a heck of a job controlling himself and not winging it out there and making 80 points.  So, I was really proud."

     

    "Did you have to help him control himself?" I asked.

     

    Singletary smiled a long time. He did some throat rumbling. Remember this is the guy who pulls down his pants, so he was working on his own self-control. "You know what," he said, "every now and then you just mention something. It's just, 'Great job.' "

     

    He meant he gave Martz positive reinforcement for not going wild with passes. He meant he kept Martz in check.

     

    That little bit is the essence of my column for Monday -- Singletary has to control Martz, certainly had to control him at the end of the Rams game. Martz loves to go bombs away, but when you have a big lead you run the ball. If Singletary can control Martz when he needs to, the Niners may have something good going. If Singletary can't control Martz somebody has to go.

    Who's the worst interim head coach in the NFL?

    I vote for Jim Haslett. I had the misfortune of observing his work today at Candlestick and, gosh, what a dud. His team was not ready to play, that's for sure. The Rams gave up 35 points in the first half, and they also gave up if you ask me.

    In addition, Haslett cost his team a 15-yard penalty by cursing at the officials. In football self-control is important especially for coaches. Haslett went for field goals late in the game when the Rams were behind by about a million points and desperately needed touchdowns, and he also punted when he absolutely had to keep drives alive. Any team watching him coach against the Niners has to throw his job application in the trash can.

    This is a quickie halftime update from the 49er game. The Rams are showing marked improvement. Last week they were down to the Jets 40-zip at halftime before 47-3. Today they are merely down to the Niners 35-3; so they have made significant improvement, and good for them. More later.

    I'm in the Candlestick press box an hour before the Niners play the Rams and I have one more thing to say about Mike Singletary and the dropped pants. I know it's really late to be writing about this once again, so sue me.

    This entry is really about sports writers and the dropped pants. Here's why. For a while everyone in the press box would say, "I can't believe he dropped his pants. It's so ridiculous."

    That changed. Mostly it changed because sportswriters always try to top each other. So after a while it was, "Dropping his pants was not a big deal. Things like that happen all the time. What's really heavy is that someone snitched on Singletary. Things that happen in a locker room should remain secret."

    So, here's what I want to say. It's certainly interesting that someone squealed on Singletary. And if someone squealed, Singletary got what he asked for. But the fact that he dropped his pants is the big news and don't let anyone tell you different.

    "Dad, the interim head coach has no pants on. Why is he walking around with his pants at his ankles, Dad? Why?"

    I pick Stanford over Cal. Maybe I don't have a ton of confidence in the pick but I'm sticking to it.

    Why do I pick the Cardinal? Because they are physical and they are tough and that should be enough to beat the over-rated Golden Bears.

    Both teams have crummy quarterbacks -- between the two teams they regularly play four quarterbacks. That's because on each team no one is good enough to be the starter. So there's no advantage there.

    Both teams have really good running backs, although Stanford has a slightly better good running back. I'm talking about Toby Gerhart, who's really something. Stanford has a better offensive line. Cal has a better defense.

    And here's the big one. Stanford is more physical, plays with the wild enthusiasm of its coach Jim Harbaugh. I think that's the difference. Stanford wins.

     

     

    What is with that USC song?

    I'm sitting here at the pressbox in Stanford Stadium and the Trojan band keeps playing that song over and over and over again. I think it has 8 notes. I think it's the most obnoxious song ever created -- not just because it's so simple. It's the sheer repetition of it that drives you batty.

    I have a theory. The song hypnotizes the opponent. As the game goes on the opponent first loses sense of time, then forgets what day it is, then forgets it's playing a football game. The song is a kind of mind control which wins games for SC. It should be banned as an illegal secret weapon.

    .......  Oh pardon me, I just fainted because of the song. I missed part of the game.

     

    Readers of the Cohn Zohn probably noticed the past few days I didn't post as many blogs as usual. It's because my friend Stuie visited from New York. We met when we were nine years old on E. 19th St. in Brooklyn as we rode our bikes over a pile of leaves in early autumn and we've been friends ever since. So I didn't blog as much while he was here. Yesterday we visited the Academy of Sciences in Golden Gate Park -- it's fabulous -- and after that went to the DeYoung Museum. He flew back today so I'll get back on the ball.

    And while I prepare for that I'm wondering why the Warriors sent DeMarcus Nelson to the D. League. I thought he was supposed to be such a find. The Warriors are almost as strange as the Niners and Raiders.

    Tomorrow I'm at Stanford/USC. Niners on Sunday.

    Lots of issues have surrounded Mike Singletary. How long did he drop his pants? How did he and Mike Martz manage to screw up the end of the Arizona game? Can he change the losing culture on the 49ers? There's more but you get the idea.

    Well, here's an original thought. None of that stuff matters, not now. What matters is this: Singletary needs to win a game. When you clear away all the smoke and noise, he is a head coach who never won a game. That is the basic fact, the ugyly fact. He can work on the culture all he wants and grab a new pair of pants, and that's all wonderful. But, Mike, win a game. Show everyone you can do it.

    Sunday is your chance. The Rams are coming to town and they stink. They are just as bad as the Niners, maybe even worse. Defeat them. Show everyone you can win over a bad team at home. Simple as that. Beat a bad team and we may take you seriously. Lose and you're just keeping a seat warm like the guy over in Oakland.

    Just win, Mike. Everything else is sound and fury.

     

    Not all A's fans are strange, but a percentage of the fans who write to me are. For example, I heard from some fans who took offense because I did not go hog wild, over the moon about the trade for Matt Holliday. I am being cautious. Like, what does this trade mean? If it's the start of the A's assembling a strong roster, terrific. But if the A's are merely renting Holliday for a season or less, then it's just the A's being the A's, the same A's who got rid of Rich Harden, Dan Haren etc. etc. etc.

    So my attitude is wait and see.

    Some A's fans want me to jump on the bandwagon right now. Sorry, no can do.

    And then there's the percentage of A's fans with Giants envy. I may not even mention the Giants in an article about the A's or a blog about the A's, and I have A's fans telling me the A's are better than the Giants, are closer to being a good team than the Giants. All that silly stuff.

    The fact is both teams stink. If A's fans want to calibrate degrees of stinkitude that's their business. But I wonder. Why can't I carry on a discussion about the A's without A's fans invoking the Giants? I think A's fans have an inferiority complex. I also know the Giants have a Cy Young Award winner, Tim Lincecum (actually two if you count the other guy), and they are likely to hold onto him.

    In the past the A's would have traded him already for 17 minor leaguers and a large box of Bazooka bubble gum and some used wrist bands. As bad as the Giants are they try to hold onto their star players. The A's always break fans hearts by getting rid of stars.

    So I wait and see about the A's. Will they supplement Holliday with other good players? Or will they unload him by the trading deadline for minor leaguers we never heard of. Let's see. And please keep the Giants out of A's discussions. They're not relevant.

     

    Congratulations to Tim Lincecum for winning the Cy Young and congrats to the Giants, as well. This award makes me think of the difference between the A's and Giants. The Giants will hold onto Lincecum and build around him. They'll also hold onto Matt Cain.

    In the past the A's would have terrific pitchers -- Tim Hudson, Dan Haren, you name them -- and then they wouldn't have them.

    This is not to put down the A's. It's to say the acquisition of Matt Holliday is promising and I hope -- and I'm sure A's fans hope -- this is the start of a new day, the start of a day when the A's get stars and keep stars, the start of a day when the A's try to build a winner instead of just pretending.

    The 49ers matter for now, that is. When was the last time a 49er game got this much interest and this much discussion? It shows there's tremendous interest in the team and if the Niners do well, they have a market and a fan base.

    But there's a but. After the smoke clears, and after we praise the 49ers for competing, and after Mike Martz explains how and why the officials confused him at the end, and after Mike Singletary makes his excuses, one fact remains. The Niners lost. And there are other facts. The team is now 2-7. And since he took over, Singletary is 0-2. Those are the brute facts and they tend to be more permanent than postgame discussions.

     

    It sure seems like something is wrong between those two guys. Several times during Monday night's game the camera focused on Singletary and Martz and they seemed to be disagreeing. Maybe arguing is more like it.

    And then Singletary threw Martz under the bus after the game. Asked about that last disastrous call -- Michael Robinson running into a million defenders, game over -- Singletary blamed Martz. "I think Coach Martz thought there would be a cavity inside."

    Well, there's going to be a cavity inside their relationship now -- maybe there was already. Granted, the call stunk. Still, coaches don't blame coaches just as players don't blame players. It's the code and Martz must feel exposed. He also must feel that Singletary is getting too much into his offense.

    All that confusion at the end, when the clock management was horrendous, when the Niners got off only two players instead of, say, four was a result of confusion between Martz and Singletary -- of two coaches giving contradictory directives. At a time like that, Martz has to be the only voice, or maybe Singletary needs to be the only voice. There cannot be two.

     

    Here is a transcript of Don Nelson's media chat from this morning.

    Cohn: On Wednesday we talked a little about playing young guys and you said give me about 30 games and we'll see where our team is headed. Now you've played a bunch of young guys (Sunday in Sacramento) so I just want to know how come and get some clarification so I understand where you're going with the team.

     

    A: They're all young. I didn't have any choice.

     

    Cohn: Guys hurt you mean?

     

    A: Yeah. Whatever is on the bench are all young. They had to play. I've got some guys that aren't ready to be primetime players yet. That's why they're working hard in practice. But when I'm forced to play them they're probably going to struggle.

     

    Cohn: Who are some of the guys who are not primetime?

     

    A: Oh, I'll just keep it general. All of the young players need to improve. You can pick your own. You're watching the games are you not?

     

    Cohn: That's all I do is think about you and watch your games.

     

    A: I doubt that.

     

    Cohn: Come on, you know that.

     

    Matt Steinmetz: You usually know the best way to win. Are you struggling with that with this team?

     

    A: No, I'm not struggling with that. I think I already know. We're young and we're not that good. If we have an injury of any kind, if any of our major players are out, not counting Monta, if anybody else is out like Al or Maggette we're going to struggle. I don't know how else to put it. We're not that strong anyway with everybody in there. It makes it very difficult to win. I understand that. I understood that from training camp on.

     

    Steinmetz: You have the idea of how you have to play if and when you're healthy or is there still some figuring to do there?

     

    A: You pretty well saw how we had to play at the beginning of the season when I had everybody. I thought we were competitive in those games. I'll take the criticism about not playing young guys if I have my veterans available. (Young guys) are not going to play as much. They'll play some. We already talked about the Al Harrington thing. I'm going to bring him off the bench now. And I'm going to play younger guys. I'm not going to play (Harrington) as many minutes as I had planned before. So they'll get an opportunity to play. But still you need your veteran players on the floor and Al will certainly get enough minutes so he can show what he can do.

     

    Steinmetz: Is there a difference between getting young players an opportunity in blowouts as opposed to competitive games?

     

    A: As long as you don't let them play garbage minutes, which we try not to do. We want them to be disciplined and do the things they would do in a normal competitive game. Just to throw the ball up and not care is counter-productive.

     

    Cohn: What is your major challenge coaching this team?

     

    A: Just understanding what we have and it will be a hard year and accepting that and working diligently. Let our youth mature and see what we have when we have all our pieces in play.

     

    Cohn: You're a winning coach. Is it hard for you sometimes?

     

    A: It's hard, yeah. It's hard not to coach a good team at this point because you're not as competitive and even though you're playing well and guys are doing what you want, it's still difficult to win the game. If you did everything right it's difficult. When you make young mistakes then it's more difficult.

     

    Janny Hu: Is there a danger to playing young players too early?

     

    A: I would say it depends on the makeup mentally of the player you're talking about. Most players or athletes are very confident. Everybody thinks they're the perfect player. That's why you have coaches to work on their deficiencies. But they don't necessarily see them. But the player who isn't self-confident, it could work a little negative. Get a little negative feedback and pretty soon you've got nothing there at all. I don't think I have many of those players on this team.

     

    Hu: If you start playing them half a season early would they develop faster?

     

    A: That's the way a writer might look at it, but I think chronologically their age has to catch up. It's just not playing time. It's maturity of their body and brains. You can't speed something up. When they're ready, play them a little more and pretty soon you'll have a really good player.

     

    Steinmetz: Is Maggette available to play Tuesday?

     

    A: Yes, he's going to try to go. He practiced a little bit today. He probably can't play his normal minutes but he'll be on the floor some.

     

     

    I was surprised this morning when I read articles about the Raiders' latest loss. Many sportswriters praised the Raiders, said they had played well even though they lost. The writers especially praised the defense.

    I don't want to start a fight -- these writers are my friends. But I disagree. Wow, do I disagree.

    For starters, a football team is one team. It is not a defense as opposed to an offense. It is one team that must play together. The Raiders obviously don't. The offense is inexcusable. And although the defense mostly played well, it did not play well when it had to. This is a fact and there is no excuse for this.

    Take Carolina's first TD. Johnny Lee Higgins fumbled the kickoff and the Panthers got the ball at the Oakland 16. I know how defenders think. They think they will stop the offense, no matter where it is. The defense will hold the offense to a field goal or even push it back out of FG range. Defenders don't start crying and tell each other, "The offense loused us up again. How can they expect us to hold the Panthers?"

    The Raiders offense predictably could not hold Carolina to a field goal or push them back and the game started 7-zip Carolina. That was not good defense. Sorry.

    Then, with the game still close, the Oakland defense gave up a 69-yard TD run. No excuse for that, no excuse for DeAngelo Williams outrunning the entire Oakland offense. And writers should not make excuses for the defense. It is the defense's job to keep close games close. End of story.

    All I know are the facts. The Raiders' record is 2-7, a grotesque record. And a team gets no credit for losing but doing some good things. A loss shows up in the standings as a loss. Period. There is no category in the standings that says Loss But The Guys Played Well Some Of The Time So Don't Hurt Their Feelings By Writing The Truth.

     

    This was an all-time first in both the culinary and football departments. An hour before today's game between the Raiders and Panthers, Raiders wide receiver Ronald Curry walked into the media eating room, filled his plate with food and went to an undisclosed location to eat up.

    I chatted with fellow reporters and photogs, and no one could remember an athlete grabbing chow from the eating room. This includes the A's who also use the Coliseum.

    Curry is a pretty good wide receiver, but coach Tom Cable and wide receivers coach James Lofton doesn't care for him and Curry isn't even active for today's game. Still, you'd expect him to hang out with the team. The fact he was in the media eating room was unusual and tells you something about his feeling for the Raiders, a really crummy team that is now scapegoating players.

    FYI, here is the menu Curry could choose from:

    wilted lettuce

    assorted bottle dressings

    a tub of scrambled eggs

    hard, lukewarm pancakes

    pork with the consistency of cardboard

    chicken parts slobbered with some kind of sauce

    overcooked, soggy vegetables

    apple pie

    Eat up, Ronald.

     

    Let me start by saying I like Nellie and I've known him 20 years. I'm not so sure what I feel about Don Nelson.

    You see, there are two separate people here: Nellie and Don Nelson. It's important you understand this distinction. Nellie is the front man, the act. Don Nelson is the reality.

    Nellie is the greatest guy you ever met. He is whimsical and jokes around and is humble and invites you to have a beer and is self-deprecating. Don Nelson enjoys his time as Nellie. But Don Nelson is nothing like Nellie.

    Don Nelson is shrewd, political and tough. Every word he says -- even when he seems to be off the cuff -- is calculated. He is brilliant with words. And he can deceive you. When he says yellow you may think he means yellow. Often he means blue and you need to be on your toes. He schemes and plans and loves power -- he' a power lover.

    When he was with the Warriors in the old days he ran George Karl out of the organization. That is my perception although I'm sure Don Nelson would dispute that. All I know is this -- Karl was coach and then Don Nelson was coach and general manager and chief potentate. So, in my mind at least a pattern of power grabbing was established.

    And now the latest. Robert Rowell, Warriors president, ran Pete D'Alessandro out of the organization, Pete a good guy, Pete a skilled negotiator with players, Pete Chris Mullin's confidante and right-hand man. That Pete.

    I have defended Pete D. in a previous blog and I don't want to lose my focus here. I'm talking about Don Nelson. How was he involved in this palace coup, a coup which leaves Mullin vulnerable, exposed and without an ally? Well, Don Nelson appears uninvolved. In his Nellie character he seemed surprised anything happened. He didn't seem to care or understand one way or another that his assistant coach Larry Riley has taken over for Pete D. But surely Don Nelson understands the meaning of this.

    Someone associated with the Warriors once told me, "Riley is little Nellie." This person meant Riley emulates Don Nelson, drinks beers with him, plays poker with him on the plane. He is a Don Nelson clone  and now this clone is Mullin's principal associate in the general manager's office. Really?

    I have learned as a journalist to ask a simple question. What do I really see? I ask this question in opposition to another question. What am I supposed to see?

    With the Warriors I'm supposed to see a coach who is befuddled by his assistant coach going over to the business side. What I really see is Don Nelson's guy infiltrating the Chris Mullin side of the Warriors. What I think I see is Don Nelson scheming to get Larry Riley in Chris Mullin's business. What I think I see is Don Nelson involved in the Pete D. firing so he could get a spy in the general manager's office. What I hope I don't see, but fear I see is Don Nelson plotting Mullin's complete overthrow with the idea of Riley becoming general manager after this season. What I think I see but I'm not sure I see is Nelson, through his operative Riley, running the show at the Warriors -- front office and coaching staff -- just as he ran everything after the fall of George Karl.

    I haven't talked to Mullin about this but he is a smart guy -- and a very good guy like Pete D. I wonder if he sees what I see.

    So, I come back to the beginning of this blog. I like Nellie because he's one hell of a guy. I mostly avoid Don Nelson.

    I woke up this morning, picked up the paper and read Warriors president Robert (The Hammer) Rowell had fired Pete D'Allessandro for insubordination, whatever that means. You may not know who Pete D. is but let me explain. He is listed in the media guide as assistant GM and he negotiates contracts and handles salary cap stuff.

    But there's more. Chris Mullin brought him into the organization and he's Mullin's right-hand man, the guy Mullin confers with and works out issues with. He's Mullin's ally and sounding board. So by firing Pete D., Rowell is making a statement to Mullin, whose contract expires at the end of the season. The statement is simple: "You may be next." It is an aggressive, clearly hostile act and it isolates Mullin in the organization. Call it a big slap in the face.

    To replace Pete D. Rowell is promoting assistanct coach Larry Riley to ass't GM. Well, that's interesting. Riley is a Don Nelson guy through and through and it's like Nelson getting his tentacles into the GM's office. Nelson who loves power, loves to run things, may be trying to neuter Mullin or push him out. This may be an extreme interpretation and I admit I'm not sure about that. So I write that only as a possibility.

    Now I'm going to write something strange. Rowell may be trying to help Mullin by firing Pete D. Pete D. came to the Warriors after service in an agent's office. He often sees things from the point of view of players and he impresses Mullin with this point of view. The Warriors have wanted Mullin to think more like a company man -- more like a GM. The Monta Ellis situation is an example. Rowell felt Mullin wanted to go too easy on Ellis. I don't agree, but that's not the point. Rowell felt Mullin saw the situation from the player's point of view, not from a front-office point of view. By eliminating Pete D. he is nudging Mullin more toward an ownership stance. In other words, he is -- or could be -- giving Mullin a chance to save his job.

    That's a big maybe. The situation at the Warriors is strange and now it's sad. Pete D. is a good guy and I wish this didn't happen.

     

    Al Harrington is a nice guy, but who is he to demand a trade because he's not getting playing time? Who is he to have a beef with Don Nelson, an all-time great coach when Harrington is an all-time mediocre player? I mean, this guy has nerve.

    What has Harrington ever done? He never got a team to the NBA finals, although when he was a sidekick on Indiana, the Pacers made it to the conference finals -- that's his total contribution for 10-plus seasons. He never was the star of a team -- far from it. He was always a sidekick to much better players on Indiana -- Ron Artest and Jermaine O'Neal come to mind as the stars in 2003-2004. And he was a sidekick on the Warriors to Baron Davis and Stephen Jackson. His teams have been to the playoffs four times and in the playoffs he's averaged 8 points. For this he's demanding a trade?

    He is notorious for not being able to rebound his position -- too small for a four, too limited for a three. And coming into this, his season from hell, he was averaging 13 points. That's it. He's 28 but he came out after high school and has big mileage on his body. He never was and never will be the centerpiece of a team. He is an adjunct.

    So where did he get all this nerve and who is advising him that he's so necessary to the league? When he's gone Warriors fans, who boo him when he wanders anywhere near the court, won't give him a second thought.

     

     

     

    This is the nicest story. It's about Sonoma County sports photographer/grape grower Jean Fruth - that's a unique combo, sports photographer/grape grower. And she's really good at both.

     

    I got to know Jean at 49er games and now I'd like you to know her. Jean has been into photography a long time but sports shooting is relatively new to her -- she's been doing it a few years. She got interested in photographing sports because she manages her kid's team in the Healdsburg Little League - her 11-year-old son Simon is a pitcher and first baseman.

     

    Before she did sports, she mostly shot landscapes, wineries and black-and-white portraits of kids. She started submitting her work to the Healdsburg Tribune, usually shots of kids playing sports. Pretty soon, the paper asked her to shoot high school varsity sports - football, wrestling, volley ball, basketball, whatever season it was.

     

    "I loved to photograph sports," she told me this morning over the phone. "It's such a good fit for me. I understand it enough to do a good job. I wanted to do pro sports, but it's hard to get into."

     

    She was good friends with Baron Wolman, the famous rock n roll photographer who also did a book of Raiders photos. Wolman introduced her to Michael Zagaris, the legendary team photographer of the 49ers and A's. Zagaris got her credentials to the A's and Niners and became her mentor for sports shooting.

     

    He arranged for her to go to spring training 2008, where she worked on the field five days in a row. "Because it's such a relaxed atmosphere," she said, "I had a lot more access to players. I got candid shots of smiling hopeful new guys just coming up to the A's, but also guys wondering who was going to Japan. Those shots were really special to me. The shots that show emotion in particular, I really like that. When I shoot the 49ers, I get lots of hanging heads - you don't want to see that but it tells the story. I got JTO fumbling the ball, the ball slipping out of his hand and I shot him hanging head and walking back to the locker room."

     

    Through the Healdsburg Tribune, Sonoma West and Windsor Times, Fruth would like to create a place where locals can go online and read stories about pro athletes and how they relate to Sonoma County.

     

    OK, that's half of Jean Fruth's story and it's a story of having an adventure and following a dream. The other half also is about having an adventure and following a dream, but in a different way.

     

    Jean used to run a chain of optical stores in New York called Cohen's Fashion Optical. She was the vice president of sales and operations at a young age. Three Cohen brothers owned Cohen's Optical. They had a simple requirement for Jean - make us a lot of money. She did. They were happy. When she moved west, the Bay Area optical chain Site for Sore Eyes was in bankruptcy and it just so happens the Cohen Bros. bought bankrupt optical chains. If they bought Site for Sore Eyes would Jean manage it for them? Heck, yes. She made them money and she ended up buying three stores from them and they were successful.

     

    Is this the American dream, or what?

     

    Around 2000, she sold them and, as she told me, "That gave me a lot of choices." She also told me, "I was able to go into photography fulltime and buy a vineyard." As choices go, those were pretty good.

     

    Why did she buy the vineyard?

     

    "I was living in Healdsburg - well, actually I split time between San Francisco and Healdsburg. (It was at this point I asked Jean if I could have her life.) With the sale of the stores I had money to invest. I didn't want to invest in the stock market -- it's what you don't know. So I bought this property in Chalk Hill. When you buy property in Sonoma County, you buy vineyard land because there's very little else. My intention was not to buy vineyard. It was to buy property. I have so many friends who are winemakers and they found this property. It's so beautiful, I knew I wanted to build on it eventually and I will. Right now we have a tree house on it. It had a vineyard just starting to produce."

     

    She has 60 acres, 20 of which are planted with room for more. She will eventually plant more but the 20 acres work very well, are profitable and manageable. The grapes grow on hilly land and that, of course, is the key. "That's why the grapes sell for what they sell for," she told me. "The hillside makes them more complex; you get lower yields but higher quality fruit as opposed to the valley floor. The grapes have a more interesting flavor."

     

    Jean grows cabernet sauvignon, syrah and zinfandel and she calls her property the Flora Ranch. "I named it for Flora, the original owner a long time ago," she said. "I named it so I can brand it. I farm it the high-end way to produce the best grapes the land will allow. Farming practices really vary. I tried to go to smaller boutique wineries so they'd make wine from those grapes so I could get a vineyard designate on those bottles - Flora Ranch. This creates demand for my grapes."

     

    Jean sells to Armida, Simi and Saxon Brown. I've had Flora Ranch syrah from Armida and Saxon Brown and they're knockouts.

     

    Jean is a good neighbor. She sells her photos and donates the money to sports programs. She's raised funds for Healdsburg High School and $3,000 for little league. You can check out Jean's photography on her website jeanfruthimages.com. I hope you get to taste her wine.

     

     

     

     

     

    This was going to be a funny blog about me and Don Nelson. I got on him before tonight's game, saying he wasn't playing Brandan Wright nearly enough - that's what my column was about. And what do you know, he played Wright and Wright had a career night and the Warriors didn't fade in the fourth quarter for a change and won the game. It was Wright's first double-double, and he had 13 rebounds, a career high, and 18 points, also a career high.

     

    After the game, Nelson gave me credit for the win in a half-hearted way. "It was you, no question about it, congratulations" he said. But I don't think he meant it. Then he got serious, so this blog is deadly serious, as it turns out.

     

    Q: Did Brandan earn himself more playing time?

     

    A: Well, absolutely. I think two things are going on here. Al (Harrington) wants to be traded, as everybody knows, and we would like to oblige him. We'd like to get a good player for him. He's playing like he's unhappy. I kind of feel for the guy because he doesn't want to be here. It's probably really difficult to really gear it up and play up to his ability. I made a deal with him. I was going to play him as many minutes as he would want and I would have kept that word but when he surprised me with going public with wanting to be traded, it's made it pretty difficult for me and everybody else. And he hasn't been playing well to go along with it, so we might as well start making the change now. I think the people in the league know he's a good player. If there's a trade to be made there we'll make it. But our front line is young and some of the guys are on the bench a lot. Brandan is ready to play more, so I'm going to play him and I hope I'm not breaking my word but I've been forced to change the way I was going to go about the playing time with Al. I thought there were going to be so many minutes between the 4 and the 3 that I didn't have to worry about it. But he's not going to be here anyway in the future. We might as well start to think about bringing some of these younger guys along. Now I'm only going to bring the guys along that are ready to play an NBA game so don't get me wrong. As I said before the game Brandan is ready. I held him back a few games to where he probably should have played. But I think it's to the point now he needs to grow into his position and he's going to be a member of our team and Al isn't, so we have to face reality and go from there.

     

    Q: That makes it seem like you need to trade him now.

     

    A: I think Al will be traded, but we've got to wait till we get the right deal for him. In the meantime, I have to bring his replacement along. I don't know what player we're going to receive for him. It could be any position from 1 to 5. I just want a good player in return, that's all. I told Al this summer as soon as we got a good player for him, I would trade him. I didn't want it to go public. I thought it would just be between the two of us. He made it public. I didn't. So there I'm stuck in a situation I don't have a great team anyway and I have a disgruntled player I was going to play probably 40 minutes a night. I can't keep my word on that anymore. We have to do what we have to do. We'll wait until we do get a good player. We're not going to wholesale and all of a sudden just get rid of him because he is a talented player and we have to receive something for him. Anyway that will happen. Mully has been working on it.

     

    Those are Nelson's remarks on Harrington and, in his polite way, Nelson trashed the guy - said Harrington broke his word and is playing poorly and needs to go. He'll be out of here real soon. So, welcome to the Warriors, Brandan Wright.

    Here's a transcript of Don Nelson's remarks before tonight's game with Denver. We asked why he's not playing his young guys even though before the season he said he would.

     

    Cohn: I'm perplexed about something. I got the impression before the season started that you were going to not worry so much about wins but play a lot of young guys. It doesn't seem you're doing that. So I'd like to know what your thinking is.

     

    Nelson: I'm going to play them before the year is out, probably, but there's a lot of them that aren't ready to play yet and I'm not giving gifts at this point of the season. They're going to have to earn their playing time. We're able to see them every day in practice and they're not NBA-ready yet at this point. The ones that are NBA-ready are getting an opportunity to play. The ones that aren't are getting more work on the practice site.

     

    Cohn: Is Brandan Wright NBA ready?

     

    Nelson: Yes, he is. He is the exception.

     

    Cohn: You mean you don't play him a lot even though he is NBA-ready.

     

    Nelson: He's been in a few games but I haven't played him a lot. But he'll play more and more as the season goes on. Yes, he is ready to play this year. He's done all right when I've put him in the game. I'm not afraid to put him in an NBA game.

     

    Tim Kawakami: Does that mean Rob Kurz is more NBA-ready than Anthony Randolph?

     

    Nelson: Yes, he's more NBA-ready than some of the younger guys in the other room.

     

    Kawakami: You understand how that would make some people kind of confused when Anthony Randolph was fairly highly touted?

     

    Nelson: He's not as talented as Anthony Randolph. I'm not talking talent here. I'm talking if you put a guy in a game right now he's not going to make an error, he knows what he's doing, he knows his game. He'll be able to play in the system without error. The other guy's loaded with talent but doesn't have those other things. Rob's got three year's experience. It just takes a while. I have a very talented young guy in the other room and he's just not ready, just like Brandan Wright wasn't ready last year.

     

    Cohn: Don, really it's a paradox. In order to get ready you have to play more. Somehow I thought that's what you were going to do this year.

     

    Nelson: I'm not just going to play guys and give them gifts. They have to earn their way onto the court. When we see positives in practice, and Belinelli's another example, he hasn't made the step that we would hope he would this year. He's got to show us that in practice, and when he does and when the time comes, then he'll get an opportunity to play. Otherwise, somebody else is going to play. Simple stuff.

     

    Kawakami: Is Marcus Williams in this conversation at all or is he written off?

     

    Nelson: You can put him in the conversation.

     

    Kawakami: Will you put him in the conversation?

     

    Nelson: I didn't think he was a young player.

     

    Janny Hu: Is he completely out of the picture now?

     

    Nelson: No, that doesn't mean that's going to be forever. I don't know. We'd like to see him, again, play better in the practice sets, play better than the people playing ahead of him right now. And if he does he'll move up and if he doesn't he'll be right where he is. These other guys are playing better, deserve to play ahead of him and are playing ahead of him.

     

    Geoff Lepper: Before that deal was made was your opinion asked?

     

    Nelson: I'm not going to discuss things that happened one way or the other.

     

    Kawakami: Did you like him?

     

    Nelson: I liked him a little bit in college. He didn't have a chance to play much in the pros. I didn't really know him that much.

     

    Kawakami: What is it specifically that he's not doing in practice?

     

    Nelson: I think he's got to get a little lighter. He's a little too heavy to get consistently in the paint. We would expect that he'd be able to make plays, find open people and things like that. He's definitely working on that. He's got to prove his quickness a little bit. And other guys have played better. What can I tell you?

     

    Unidentified reporter: How would you say DeMarcus Nelson has played for you??

     

    Nelson: He's not a perfect player. He's a young player that's actually played better than anybody else. So he's playing ahead of people right now. He makes some errors out there, doesn't do everything right but it's good to have him on the floor. He's a very good player and he's competitive and he does more than one thing. He plays a pretty solid all around game from the defensive end to the offensive end. For those who have written I don't care much about defense they're totally wrong. That's where his forte is on the defensive end and I love players who do more than one thing. And he's one of those kinds of players. He plays and he guards every night and he does a lot of positive things for the team. Is he a young player?

     

    Yes,

     

    Nelson, being sarcastic: Oh, is he playing? I'm out of here. I got a cigar to smoke.

     

    Cohn: Can I ask one more question.

     

    Nelson: I've got bigger fish to fry.

     

    Cohn: I'm a little fish but I have one more question. Is it a goal for you to get this team into the playoffs?

     

    Nelson: It would be good to be in the hunt again. That's always fun. We're trying like heck to win games early to see where we are. Like I said, let's look and see where we are at 30 games. If things aren't looking so well maybe I'll give some gifts to the younger guys, but right now they have to earn their minutes.

     

    Cohn: Go fry a fish.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Here is the transcript of my conversation with 27-year-old Jed York this morning at 10:00 a.m. at 49ers headquarters in Santa Clara. See what you think of York's personality. Is he open, respectful, smart? Does he have a plan? I originally planned to run this blog on Saturday, but I thought, why wait? My column on York runs Sunday.

     

    Cohn: What time did you get here today?

     

    York: Today I had a dentist appointment. I got in maybe 15 minutes ago.

     

    Cohn: When do you usually get in?

     

    York: 6:30

     

    Cohn: You live in the Marina?

     

    York: I split time. I'm here about half the time. My dad has an apartment down the street, so usually during the week I'm here. I go back to the Marina half the time. My commute today, going from the dentist in Foster City to here, leaving at 8:00 a.m., I got here at 9:45.

     

    Cohn: Because of traffic?

     

    York: It was awful, awful.

     

    Cohn: In a typical day how many hours do you spend here?

     

    York: It depends on what a typical day is. I would say Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday I stay in Santa Clara so I'm here from 6:30, 7:00 in the morning until midnight. Usually Mondays and Fridays I'll go back, so a normal workday is 6:30 in the morning till 6 at night.

     

    Cohn: Is 49ers pretty much what you do?

     

    York: It's all I do.

     

    Cohn: Do you have a life apart from the 49ers?

     

    York: Do you mean a personal life? I'm so committed to getting this thing right and there's a lot of work that needs to be done it's really hard for me to go out and do a bunch of other things. And I have a girlfriend so there's not a lot of personal life outside of that.

     

    Cohn: She must be very devoted.

     

    York: She's awesome.

     

    Cohn: What is your job? How would you describe what your job is and what you do on your job?

     

    York: My job is ever evolving. I get more and more responsibilities. When I started I literally went through every piece of the organization. Not as an intern but as a bottom-level employee that learned every piece of the business.

     

    Cohn: Give me an example.

     

    York: I started working with Steve Urbaniak in the equipment room learning to sew jerseys, watching him and how they fold laundry and then going over with the equipment group and learning how they tie different knots for ice packs, and literally going around every piece of the building the first six months or so I was here. I have continually grown in my responsibilities. I've always been somebody that my parents have looked to and they've sought my opinion. As time has gone on it's more and more transferred to me starting to make some of those decisions.

     

    Cohn: When you started from the bottom up was that your parents' idea?

     

    York: It was a combination. It was something I wanted too. I was young when I came in. I'm still relatively young. I had experience in New York working in the financial world. But coming to the 49ers, I've known coaches and general managers and high executives, but some of the other people that worked here might not have known me personally and I might not have known them personally and what they do. So for me working with the equipment manager and working with the trainers and seeing everything they're doing gave me a good working knowledge of what goes into every piece of the organization.

     

    Cohn: Coming back to this question, you did an apprenticeship, which is praiseworthy. What is your job now? You say it's ever evolving. You spend all these hours here. What are some of the tasks you would be confronting in a day?

     

    York: The largest task right now is obviously a new stadium and working on that. We just had the election finalized. I think the votes are final so our council in Santa Clara is set, at least for the next two years. So we can pretty much continue that negotiation with the city manager' office and we can probably present something to them when the city manager and our group finalize a deal that we can present to the council sometime in early 2009, so we can get it on a ballot. That's the main thing I'm working on. If you're looking at large tasks, we obviously have a labor issue that's out there. Working on that - how that affects us, what the potential outcomes are going to be. We have a coaching change that we just made - looking at some of the options that we potentially had before we made the change and who was the right guy. Obviously we talked, Scot and I, about who was the right person on staff. Mike Singletary was the guy that was a unanimous decision between Scot and myself. He recommended that. We seconded the opinion. Looking at the end of the season, how can we make our team better? So I'm working a lot with Scot and listening to him and figuring out -- what are we looking at, cash spending, what are we trying to address in the offseason? It's not me making that decision but it's being part of that decision and understanding why we're making decisions that we're making.

     

    Cohn: You mentioned you had worked in New York. What was your job?

     

    York: I worked for a company called Guggenheim Partners. I started there right out of college. The guys I worked for were from all across the board - the Guggenheim family, and other prominent American families, Hearst, the Gettys, people like that. They'd had informal investing relationships for a century or so. We were risk managers. I was there two years.

     

    Cohn: When did you come to the 49ers?

     

    York: March of 2005.

     

    Cohn: Do we now consider you the face of the franchise? You seem to be very visible lately. The last few times I called your dad he said, "I'm not talking." It took a long time for it to cross a synapse in my brain that I was probably calling the wrong guy. Do I assume you're the face of the franchise? You certainly seem more visible.

     

    York: I definitely think I'm more visible and at the press conference (announcing Singletary) people asked, "Are you the owner?" I'm not the one who's writing the checks. My parents are writing the checks. That's not going to change. My parents are the owners. I'm a part of the ownership group but I'm the person who's here on a day-to-day basis. So you'll see me more and more as the face of the executive decision-making of the organization and I think my parents are trusting me more and more to make those decisions. If you want to call it the face of the franchise or whatever it is that's not for me to decide. I just know what my job is. I do think I'll be interacting more with the media than my parents will. Does that mean I'm going to answer questions on a weekly basis or a daily basis? No, but we do want to make sure our fans and the general public understand what ownership is doing and why we're doing it. I will be the person delivering those messages.

     

    Cohn: How much autonomy do you have in decision making?

     

    York: My parents trust me a lot to make decisions but obviously when you're writing checks and you're writing big checks they want to make sure they know what's going on. I trust somebody like Andy Dolich (Chief Operating Officer) who has a lot of experience not just in the Bay Area but professional sports in general. I trust somebody like Scot McCloughan our general manager. They're the ones making decisions for football or business operations but they're presenting their decisions to me. Along with my family there's a lot of autonomy in decisions I'm making. Again, that role is continuing to expand and depending on what my parents want and when they want me to have full autonomy on decision making it's up to them.

     

    Cohn: How often do you talk to your mom and/or dad about business stuff?

     

    York: I was stuck in traffic an hour and 45 minutes coming down here after my dentist appointment. My dad and I probably talked 45 minutes just catching up on where we're at. I didn't know if you heard about the DeAngelo Hall thing. Things like that we'll catch up on. We'll catch up on whatever meetings we're having with the stadium and he keeps me up to date on some of the things from the international committee. He's on the audit committee, and how that affects what we do on a daily basis here. So my father's really the face of the ownership group when it comes to New York and the league office and he's the person that's on the majority of the committees.

     

    Cohn: What if you and your dad and your mom are trying to reach a decision but there's disagreement. How does that get resolved?

     

    York: That really hasn't happened much but if you want to go to a hypothetical they trust that I'm here on a daily basis, that I have a good feel for what's going on in the organization and unless they think it's really wrong they trust me to make decisions.

     

    Cohn: How did it come about that I'm talking to you and your dad doesn't seem to be around as much? There's been an evolution. How did it happen?

     

    York: It's funny. I look at some of the pictures around here. There's a picture of me cutting the ribbon for this building. It's Bill Walsh, my uncle Eddie, my mom, me, and my grandfather in the background and my dad in the background. I was cutting the ribbon for this building. I was seven, eight years old. I remember being around my uncle and my grandfather and my mom when they were making decisions about either the Pittsburgh Penguins or the 49ers. And it wasn't like somebody took me under their wing and said, "OK, Jed, this is how you're an owner of a professional sports franchise." They always knew I was going to carry on their legacy at one point. I think that's carried with my parents where they wanted me to go off and do something on my own and go to New York. There was some discussion at the time. Do I come here early or after five or six years? It was kind of the plan. As they've seen me progressing the more autonomy they've given me to make decisions. So it wasn't that my dad sat down over dinner, "Son, it's time for you to run the team." It's been something kind of like Aaron Rodgers and Green Bay. When's the right time for him to take over? I don't know. When he was ready they made the decision this summer and they pushed a Hall of Fame quarterback out. That's kind of how it is here. When I'm ready to make the decisions they'll allow me to do that. It's not that something has been planned.

     

    Cohn: You could have done other things and yet you work at the 49ers, why?

     

    York: You say I could have done other things.

     

    Cohn: You were at Guggenheim.

     

    York: Right, but the rules were before you did something with the family you needed to go out and do something on your own. That was always a part of what I was going to do. In my mind I didn't have a choice in what I wanted to do. I always knew what I wanted to do. I always wanted to follow in my grandfather's footsteps. (He's talking about Edward DeBartolo, Sr.) And I've always worked to be on that path.

     

    Cohn: What footsteps are those?

     

    York: The things he created whether it was the real estate business, whether it was professional sports, I've always put my grandfather on a pedestal. He's my hero. When you're a little kid and you see you can become a major player in professional sports I couldn't think of anything else I'd ever want to do. Obviously, I could have done something else but I never wanted to other than being a quarterback. It never crossed my mind that I could do anything other than what I'm doing now.

     

    Cohn: Kind of like born to the job.

     

    York: I mean with going to Notre Dame. My grandfather went to Notre Dame. My dad, my uncle Eddie went to ND. I was the third generation. There was nowhere else I was going to go to school. I was going to go where my grandfather went to school.

     

    Cohn: What does your grandfather mean to you?

     

    York: Everything. You see Barack Obama being the president and I think that's a huge step for our country, a huge step forward that we've made a change that we can elect an African American president. When I look at my grandfather and you talk about the American dream his father died before he was born. He didn't really like school. He didn't go to grade school that much. He tried to work. In the situation he was in he needed to work. They ran a grocery store. His stepfather had a construction business - he was driving dump trucks when he was 13 years old. And you see what he created from literally nothing. I don't think anybody can do the things my grandfather did. Everything that I have, everything that my parents have and my uncle has, came from what my grandfather started. To me there's a huge legacy to live up to, not that I have to do something more than my grandfather or be bigger than my grandfather but to carry on what he started. That's very important to me because I've been given every opportunity, more opportunities than probably 99.9 percent of people in the world and it is important for me to carry on the legacy that he started.

     

    Cohn: It's like a trust that's been passed onto you.

     

    York: Yes.

     

    Cohn: Here's a question I got from a reader. Jed is 27. Why does Jed think he's not too young or inexperienced to be in the position he's in?

     

    York: Because growing up I've always been around the 49ers or the Penguins or my grandfather and his real estate business. I've always been exposed to more things and I think I'm more mature than a typical 27 year old. But I'm not competent enough to run this by myself. I need somebody like Andy Dolich who can help mentor me. I have somebody I've been working with, a guy named Mike Rossi who was a vice chairman for Bank of America. He's helped sort of guide me and mentor me in some of my executive skills. It's not me doing this on my own. I always make sure I have somebody that I trust, that I can go to. And my uncle with football. There's nobody better to talk to from an ownership standpoint than my uncle. Some of the decisions that I'm making he's gone through it. He made mistakes.

     

    Cohn: He was green at the beginning.

     

    York: I'm green but I'm trying to make sure I have the right people around. I'm obviously going to make mistakes. But it's how am I going to respond to those mistakes and who do I go to? I know I don't have every answer and because I don't have every answer I'm going to turn to my uncle or somebody like Mike Rossi and make sure I get guidance when I'm faced with a challenge I might not know how to tackle on my own.

     

    Cohn: What is your role in turning around the franchise?

     

    York: Everything. My role is bringing the 49ers back. We talked about this in an all-hands meeting.

     

    Cohn: What's an all-hands meeting?

     

    York: Everybody in the organization. We talked about this. It was actually before we were playing the Patriots. I said they've taken our position on the mantle of being the professional sports franchise that everyone wants to emulate. That was the San Francisco 49ers and until we get back to that point then we haven't achieved what we're trying to achieve. I look at what we had here in the 80s and early 90s. I know the history and I know how tough it was to change that culture. My job is to make sure we bring that culture back and make sure we are back to that championship culture. And that doesn't start with one player here, one coach there. It starts with a mindset.

     

    Cohn: What sort of questions will you ask your uncle?

     

    York: I talked to him last year about Coach Nolan. There were a lot of questions. Do you bring Coach Nolan back or not? He didn't say keep him or don't keep him. He just said, "You saw what it was like under Dennis (Erickson). Did that feel right?" "No, it didn't." "Does it feel right now? Do the players play for him?" "And yes I think they do." I think part of the letdown you saw last week against Seattle was an emotional letdown of letting your coach go before a bye week. My uncle is influential in helping me understand the greater picture. I talk to him about guys on our staff. Obviously you have coach Martz who has head coaching experience and I talked to my uncle and said, "What do you think (about making him head coach)?" And he said, Well you have somebody who has head coaching experience but is that going to leave you weak on the offensive side?" "It probably would. There's an extremely different task from being the offensive coordinator from the head coach." He said, "Who's the best leader you have?" "OK, Coach Singletary." "Well, if Coach Singletary is there does your defense stay intact, does your offense stay intact?" "Yes." So, it's not that he said, "Hey, put Mike Singletary." He just kind of helped me through it to let me make the decision.

     

    Cohn: How do you negotiate the fact that Eddie and your dad are not close? Is that a conflict for you?

     

    York: It's not a conflict and they've never been best buddies but they've always had a lot of respect for each other. It's like any typical brother-in-law relationship. You might not get along with your brother-in-law but you respect your brother-in-law. They have different skill sets and different strengths and different weaknesses so I try to pull the best from everybody."

     

    Cohn: Question from a reader: Do you see the need for a strong senior manager with prior experience in a successful franchise to work above Scot McCloughan?

     

    York: I believe in Scot. I haven't talked to Ron Wolf (former general manager of the Packers) a lot myself but my father talked to Ron a lot before we hired Scot. Scot worked under Ron. Ron is somebody I know Scot goes to similar to me going to my uncle. Bringing Ron in here would not change - not putting Ron down - I don't think that would change Scot's relationship with Ron and how he uses somebody that is a senior manager. I don't think there are a lot of people out there. Just because you have a lot of experience doesn't mean you're a strong leader, that you can come in and help the organization. All of us will go to our people whether it's Ron Wolf for Scot, whether it's my uncle for me, to help us make some of those decisions.

     

    Cohn: I respectfully disagree with you on that. For what it's worth, I think you need someone and I do think the fan base is looking to that.

     

    York: As I said when you asked me before (several weeks ago) during the middle of the season, we're not discussing internally what we're going to do at the end of the season. If the right person was there, you might consider it. But you don't want to force something to mess the organization up. You look at what Miami did. Parcells came in and he brought his guys with him. You can't force a Parcells into an organization because I do think Scot has a lot of talent. He's a great talent evaluator. You'll see him now being the general manager and having full autonomy and making those decisions. I was in the room when we picked Patrick Willis and I saw a bunch of defensive coaches that weren't sure Patrick was the right guy or not. And Scot was the one who said, "Listen, this is who we've chosen. This is what we talked about the whole time if Patrick was there, Patrick is our guy." That's what I saw - Scot has the ability to be our general manager. I agree that both of us are green and we do need some assistance from folks around but forcing somebody in there that doesn't fit with the culture isn't going to make the 49ers better. You see, and I'm not going to name teams, but when you don't have an understanding of what your culture is and you're trying to fit talent and not personalities, you're never going to be successful.

     

    Cohn: If the stadium doesn't work with Santa Clara would you consider San Francisco?

     

    York: San Francisco is definitely an alternative for us now. But where we're at Santa Clara is definitely the best option. In my hour and 45 minute commute from Foster City today it just kept ringing true that you need someplace that you can get to from public transportation. As we continue to move forward in 15, 20 or 30 years I don't think you're going to see 20,000 or 30,000 cars driving to one location for a football game. In Santa Clara you've got the light rail that comes across, you've got a commuter rail that's right here, you've got 880, you've got 101, you've got a lot of parking that's not used on Sunday afternoons. It makes a lot of sense to be in a place where the infrastructure is set. Now San Francisco doesn't have enough infrastructure for us at Candlestick. It's not just a football stadium. It's how do your fans get there? And is it an enjoyable time before and after for fans?

     

    Cohn: Last question, could you make a direct statement to the fans of why they should have confidence that this team they love will turn around in a timely fashion?

     

    York: I'm the biggest 49er fan there is and I've grown up a 49er fan. It hurts me more than anybody else to see the 49ers not consistently in the playoffs and not competing for Super Bowls. I'm not going to rest until we get this thing right. I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure we get this thing right and that's spending money on talent and coaches, making sure we have the right people here to win, but making sure it's not a culture of win at any cost. But it's a culture of how the 49ers win, winning with class. That's very important to me, not going out and having guys who are getting in trouble off the field and domestic abuse and getting in shooting sprees in strip clubs. That's not the type of guys we're going to bring in here. We're going to win with class and we're going to be on top of the mantle.

     

     

     

    I just returned from interviewing Jed York for about 40 minutes in a conference room at the 49er facility in Santa Clara. As I mentioned yesterday, I will post the full transcript of our interview on the Cohn Zohn Saturday afternoon. My column about Jed will post on the Press Democrat website Saturday night and will appear in the newspaper Sunday morning.

    Quick impressions of Jed: Poised. Polite. Did not shy away from any questions. Seems older than 27. Eager to learn and to make the team succeed. Still has lots to learn, but he admits that. I found him more social than his dad John, as charming and determined as his uncle Eddie without having the undercurrent that Eddie had -- that he could blow at any minute.

    Tonight I'm at the Warriors. I'll keep in touch from there.

     

    Cohn Zohn readers, I am interviewing Jed York Wednesday morning in Santa Clara.

    I am not going down there to nail him. That would not be polite. I'm simply trying to find out who Jed is now that he's becoming the face of the 49ers. I'll ask about his background and his plans for the team, etc. My column on Jed will run in the Press Democrat on Sunday, but will appear on the website late Saturday. I also will put up the transcript of the interview on the Cohn Zohn Saturday afternoon.

    If any readers have questions you'd like me to ask Jed, I encourage you to write to the Cohn Zohn.

    -- Lowell

    You don't ever want to be in Don Nelson's doghouse. Nelson seems like the most easygoing guy, but there's a hard stubborn side to him and you see it all the time.

    Currently, he's being stubborn with Marcus Williams a point guard he can and should use. Because, remember, he doesn't have a point guard. So at least he should take a look at what Williams can do in a game. Nelson didn't even dress him for the stink out in Memphis.

    This makes Chris Mullin look bad because Mullin went out and got Williams. But it also makes Nelson look bad and it reminds us he gives up on players very fast. Hello Brandan Wright.

    Years ago he made Tyrone Hill's life miserable, turned the guy into a basket case. Hill left Oakland and became an all star. Nelson also had trouble with Chris Webber, duh, and Patrick Ewing, so there's another side to him. If you ever get in his doghouse you never get out. Williams is in the doghouse and that could be to the Warriors' and Nelson's detriment.

    There's something else I wonder about. I thought Nelson didn't care about the playoffs this season. That's what he said not long ago. He was going to develop his young players. Really? So how come Marco Belinelli and Wright and Anthony Randolph almost never make it to the court. What's going on over there, anyway? And how come Nelson seems so in love with Corey Maggette who seems like the most undisciplined player. He shoots and shoots. If someone else is open, Maggette doesn't care. He shoots.

    Whoever leaked the story of the dropped pants caper can rest easy. Singletary has called off the dogs. The highly interim 49er head coach was obsessed for a while with who did it and why and how could anyone violate the sanctity of the locker room -- that kind of junk.

    Then he came to his senses and realized he's supposed to be a coach not a cop, which means he's allegedly working on the game plan as opposed to staking out the locker room for the snitch. It's always good when a coach gets his priorities straight.

    What is this with Niner coaches and clothes, anyway? Mike Nolan wore a suit and the new guy drops his pants. There's a clothes fetish over there.

    An astute reader of the Cohn Zohn proposed a fascinating and scary propostion: Don Nelson is siding with Warriors president Robert Rowell against Chris Mullin.

    Believe me, this scenario has crossed my mind, mostly because Nelson is 100 percent a political animal who gravitates to power and loves to wield power.

    But I don't think he's become Mullin's antagonist, at least not yet. Mullin brought him back to the Warriors so there may be a feeling of loyalty, although loyalty can  come and go.

    What's disturbing to me and probably to the reader is that Nelson has not stepped forward in defense of Mullin. When Nelson got his contract extension he was asked if he'd speak on Mullin's behalf about a Mullin extension. Nelson said he does not see them as a package deal. In other words, Nelson got his and if Mullin wants his own, that's Mullin's affair. This was not an antagonistic stance toward Mulllin but it wasn't supportive, either. Nelson was being Switzerland.

    In addition, Nelson has scorned guard Marcus Williams, a Mullin find. Coaches dislike players all the time and that dislike is not necessarily an antagonistic act toward the GM. Still, you wonder why Nelson doesn't give Williams at least a chance, and clearly this makes Mullin look bad and it makes Nelson seem unconcerned with Mulllin's image in the organization.

    It would be nice if Nelson, who clearly has power, would speak up for Mullin. That would have weight. He has not done that as far as I can tell.

    I believe the Mullin/Nelson relationship bears watching. Nelson may throw Mullin overboard but I don't think he's done it yet.

    I wrote a column which will appear tomorrow in the Press Democrat. It's about Warriors president Robert Rowell who's accumulated power like mad in that organization. I'm afraid he's pushing out Chris Mullin.

    Here's a summary of the column. Early in his career as general manager Mullin made some bad deals. This is known. He awarded big contracts to Adonal Foyle, Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy. But he's grown as a GM and is excellent at his job. He got the Warriors into the playoffs two seasons ago and the team won 48 games last season and Mullin has them going in the right direction.

    Rowell threatens to louse things up. He wants, I believe, Mullin to be a yes man for him. But Mullin asserts himself more and Rowell would prefer a docile Mullin. Mullin wanted to punish Monta Ellis but not as severely as Rowell actually did. Ellis' suspension of 30 games is the third-longest in league history, tied with Stephen Jackson who ran into the stands and hit fans. It is a harsh punishment.

    Mullin had a deal for Baron Davis to remain in Oakland and Rowell killed the deal. I don't believe Mullin will stay in Oakland as a mere figurehead and I believe Rowell wants him to be a figurehead. If Mullin leaves the Warriors will be much worse off.

    Lots of bitterness toward JaMarcus Russell in my email. People say he's too dumb to be a good quarterback. I get this a lot.

    So, here's what I want to know. Did any of my readers give him an IQ test? Did any of my readers actually talk to Russell? This dumb business is tricky and insidious and off base. I don't know how smart he is one way or another but he's sure smart enough to be an NFL quarterback.

    I'll defend his brains and his good nature but I won't defend his play. I'll admit he has excuses -- missed most of last year, has awful players around him and abysmal coaching. But he has been lacking one thing, which a football insider friend of mine mentioned this morning.

    He lacks passion. He goes three and out and trots off the field as if it's no big deal, as if it's a Friday night pickup game with his friends and they're playing for a keg of beer. The team defends his lack of passion. The team says he is an even-keel guy, you know no highs or lows.

    Who said a QB needs to be an even-keel guy? Was Joe Montana even keel? No. He burned with passion and so did Steve Young. And what about Rich Gannon? Teammates disliked him because he was so hard-driving. He'd scream at players who screwed up and he slammed his helmet to the ground when he was mad. But he got results. Forget even keel, JaMarcus. Show some passion. Play like you care.

    Let's be real blunt about this. The Raiders stunk today. They lost 24-0 but it was much worse than that. They got slaughtered by a mediocre team and they have no hope this season and they've gotten worse under interim coach Tom Cable.

    They had three first downs the entire game and the defense quit in the first half. They are inexcusable. And interim coach Tom Cable doesn't know what to do about any of this.

    He is a bad head coach who can't get a team ready. He will be gone after this season, does not stand a chance.

    Most of this is not his fault. Name me a coach and I'll show you someone who cannot succeed with the awful Raiders -- one very bad football organization. That doesn't mean Cable is any good because he's not.

    5th worst: Arizona. Traditionally a joke but making progress.

    4th worst: 49ers. These people don't have a clue. And the coach pulled down his pants. By the way I'm at the Raiders and it's halftime and the Raides are getting creamed 24-zip. If Singletary were coaching Oakland he'd be completely naked at this point to motivate his guys.

    3rd worst: Bengals. Truly horrible. What makes them worse than 49ers is that they get their guys arrested. You could say, the Niners can't even get their guys arrested unless it's for indecent exposure.

    2nd worst: Raiders. Completely hopeless -- what they're doing right now against Atlanta is outrageous. But there is a worse organization than Oakland -- as unbelievable as that is.

    worst: Detroit. No explanation required.

    This is a heartfelt letter of thanks to Sandy Barbour, Athletic Director at the Unviersity of California, Berkeley.

    Dear Sandy:

    I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for being so considerate on Saturday during the football game between the Bears and Oregon Ducks. As you know it was raining very hard on Saturday -- one Biblical scholar told me it was like the prelude to Noah's flood.

    Unfortunately the press box in Memorial Stadium dates from the time of Noah. It's a terrific press box on a nice day but during inclement weather -- so often the case in football season -- it's a tough place to work.

    Like on Saturday. The rain assaulted the press box in sheets and made the work desks, well, unworkable. Like me, most sportswriters could not use our computers during the game for fear of death from electric shock. Some reporters said it might be considerate of you to put some kind of temporary apparatus on top or in front of the press box to protect writers so they can write.

    I don't think that's necessary. And this is where I praise you. During the game your representatives came around and personally handed to every writer one garbage bag and one towel. The towel helped us wipe the wet desks and, thanks to you, the desks would stay dry for up to two minutes. The garbage bags were a versatile touch. We could use them as panchos or if we were on early deadlines, we could cover our computers with them and somehow write in the garbage bag. If you don't know how that's done I'd love you to visit us in the rain for a demonstration.

    So thanks, Sandy, for your help but mostly for your professionalism during a potentially trying time.

    Best regards,

    Lowell Cohn, Santa Rosa Press Democrat

     

     

    Latest news out of the Niners is that interim head coach Mike Singletary -- aka the Underpants Man -- is on a crusade to discover who leaked to the media that he dropped trou at halftime last Sunday. Singletary said what goes on in the locker room is "sacred" and he'll get to the bottom, as it were, of who leaked. Which seems to imply that Singletary's underpants are part of the sacredness -- does he wear Calvin Klein's?

    Singletary ought to get something straight. He got a pass on how horribly the Niners played last week. He got a pass because he had only a few days to prepare and people went easy on him. He got a pass because he did some flamboyant/terrific things -- benching JTO and letting Vernon Davis have it, and delivering that dramatic postgame speech to the media. So he got a pass.

    But facts are facts. He did not get his team ready -- the 49ers looked terrible. And that falls on him. And now he's launching an investigation to find the leaker. Get your priorities straight, coach. You're only interim. You need to be a coach. You need to win. If you flop, you'll end up being the butt of a joke, as it were.

     

    After Cal beat Oregon today, Jeff Tedford heaped praise upon former Cal QB Aaron Rodgers who just signed a six-year contract extension with the Packers. Tedford said he send a text message of congratulations to Rodgers. It's being reported $20 million of Rodgers extension is guaranteed. This is a good thing for Rodgers who slipped to 24th in the 2005 draft, a huge disappointment for him and Cal.

    "I felt bad for him when he came away from here," Tedford said. "I felt he could have been the first pick when he dropped to (24th). I felt bad for him. I said to him that the second contract is going to be worthwhile and it didn't take long for him to get it. He's a great player and a great guy."

    Of course, the subtext to Rodgers' success is the flop by Alex Smith who was the first QB taken in that draft. It seems things finally achieved their correct balance.

Want to read an old post? Click here.