So I was wondering ....
President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for ... well, um ... 2009.
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger collects an award from a national parks foundation after trying to close hundreds of parks (and settling for slashing hours, raising fees and generally making them less attractive).
Do you suppose Caltrans has created enough havoc on the
-- Jim Sweeney
Phillip Burton, the congressman and legendary
That would be the 1981 congressional reapportionment plan
for
If you like want to try your hand at abstract art and your dance card is clear for, oh, 2011, the state will soon start accepting applications for appointments to an independent commission that will draw legislative boundaries after the 2010 census.
By passing Proposition 11 last year, voters took the job away from legislators, who used to have the power to pick their own voters. When they couldn't agree, the job fell to the Supreme Court.
Given increasingly sophisticated databases that can mine voter rolls, election returns and an array of demographic data, competitive legislative elections have all but disappeared, except for the occasional primary contest. That's a major reason that the Capitol is populated by hardcore conservatives and unwavering liberals, and cooperation and compromise are treated like cowardice and surrender.
The authors of Proposition 11 exempted congressional districts, in effect choosing self preservation (the state's House members were prepared to spend millions to defeat Proposition 11) over principle. A successful effort by the commission probably would create pressure to extend the system to Congress for the next round of reapportionment.
The state auditor (www.bsa.ca.gov/redistricting) will begin accepting applications for the 14 commission slots on Dec. 15. You're not eligible if you're a registered lobbyist, if you've changed party affiliation in the past five years or if you have made more than $2,000 in campaign contributions. You may be asked to write a 250-word essay. Perhaps an appreciation of Piccaso's work?
-- Jim Sweeney
Supervisor Carrillo says he doubts landfill will be reopened
In a major surprise, Supervisor Efren Carrillo joined Shirlee Zane today in rejecting the sale of the
Many applauded the outcome, but don't expect that this means the county will seek to reopen the landfill on its own. Sonoma County still lacks the financial resources to do that.
"I don't see us in a financial position to open it, frankly," Carrillo told me this afternoon. "We may have to look at (going out to bid) for outhaul contracts."
For that matter, the county also lacks the $11 million needed to formally close and seal the landfill. As I noted in an earlier blog, the state has ordered the county to either sell the landfill or close it immediately. That letter, sent Friday, is concerning to staff and the board.
When I talked to Carrillo this afternoon, he was in the process of writing letters to Assemblyman Wes Chesbro, a former member of the state Integrated Waste Management Board, and Assemblyman Jared Huffman seeking their help in getting an extension on this quick closure mandate. He said the cities in the county also "are really going to have to participate with us on this."
The outcome was a surprise because a straw vote taken Sept. 29 showed unanimous support for a sale. Zane later indicated that she was likely to oppose the deal although Carrillo didn't tip his cards until today.
So what was the difference?
"For me what it came down to was really trying to think of this in a long-term context and not handing down the issue to a private entity," he told me. "The time to resolve these problems is now . . . The 20-year contract was just too long for me."
He said he thought the board was presenting "a new direction in how we look at trash."
He wants the county to set "the gold standard" of 100 percent diversion. But the sale to Republic came with a promise to ship the county's garbage to the landfill, once Republic got state permission to reopen it, for the next 20 years. The way the contract worked, if residents lowered their waste disposal, their rates went up. There also was no financial incentive for Republic to reduce the waste stream.
"I hope this is going to spark the debate to really look at diversion in a more serious way," Carrillo said. "We have momentum. The community is paying attention and, quite frankly, the people don't want us to take a back seat on this."
Is it possible that Republic could come back with an updated offer? Yes. "But as far as I'm concerned," he said, "we are looking at a new direction."
- Paul Gullixson
The
For residents of the
Most obvious is the bill.
Neither
So should the bonds be an automatic no vote for
There may not be much sympathy for Southern California
swimming pools, and there's plenty of reasons to have mixed feelings about
But a plan that also emphasizes restoration of the
deteriorating Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta might be worth paying for. And it
might pay dividends for sport and commercial fishermen, two
Does the plan unveiled in
-- Jim Sweeney
From what I hear, one
But here's one of the main reasons you can expect the board to go ahead with selling the dump to Arizona-based Republic Services: The county is out of time to do anything else.
State officials have made it clear that
"We further reiterate that any rejection of the divestiture (sale) premised on the future reopening of the facility by the county would in no way change the requirement that all closure activities must proceed forthwith, including the placement of final cover across the entire facility," wrote Scott Walker, a staff member who overseas landfill closures.
Translation: If the county opts not to sell, it will have to close the landfill (a very costly process) before reopening it (another very costly and bureaucratic process.)
This is not only crazy, it would force the county to continue trucking its garbage as far as Alameda County and Solano County.
So exactly how is this helping the environment - or serving taxpayer interests?
- Paul Gullixson
At last week's meeting, Mayor Amie Breeze, who originally supported the idea of hiring a headhunter to conduct a broad search for a
Councilmember Joe Callinan joined her in opposing a nationwide search. But here's the odd thing. When their position did not prevail among their colleagues at the Oct. 13 meeting, both the mayor and Callinan refused to participate any further in the selection of an executive search firm. They essentially have left it to their City Council colleagues, Gina Belforte, Jake Mackenzie and Pam Stafford, to pick the finalists to be interviewed for the search job.
One might expect to see that kind of reaction on a playground. But at a City Council meeting?
The speculation is that Breeze and Callinan are hoping to bring Carl Leivo back in as city manager, succeeding the much-respected Steve Donley who recently resigned to stay in the U.S. Coast Guard. Hence, the emphasis on a local search.
Leivo, who became city manager in 2003, was ousted in March of 2005, about three months after a
Is this the kind of divisiveness that the city of
In any event, it doesn't appear the votes are there to go that route anyway. But it will be interesting to see what Breeze and Callinan decide to do at the next City Council meeting on Oct. 26. Will they vote on picking an executive search firm - or will they sit it out again because they didn't get their way?
- Paul Gullixson
The Loma Prieta quake gave me a good shake in my third-floor office in Sacramento, more than 100 miles from the epicenter. I arrived in San Francisco a couple hours later, watching houses burn in the Marina from the Golden Gate Bridge.
But the quake story I remember best came two days later when I got a tip that 16 children who had suffered serious injuries in the catastrophic Armenian quake less a year earlier were in San Francisco for medical treatment, having arrived just in time for another quake. I met two of them at the old Shriner's hospital, where they talked about the quake at home that killed 25,000 people and the one they had just experienced.
They were sweet kids, it was a nice day and their stories of survival were a welcome change after a couple of days covering the worst of the damage in the Bay Area. Here's the top of my Oct. 20, 1989 story from the Los Angeles Daily News:
SAN FRANCISCO - Hermine Menjelikian and Mher Pekhlivania were sitting in their classrooms in Soviet Armenia 10 months ago when the walls collapsed on them in a massive earthquake that killed at least 25,000 people.
On Tuesday, they were in San Francisco when the earth again shook violently. They were at the Shriner's Children's Hospital being treated for bone and nerve damage suffered in the Armenian quake.
None of the 16 Armenian children who were brought to the Bay Area Oct. 1 for medical treatment was injured Tuesday, and only an 11-year-old boy was emotionally traumatized by going through a second disastrous quake.
"I told him not to worry," Mher, 13, said in Armenian through the interpreter. "These are very strong structures, not like the ones back home. But he said (about the house where he is staying) 'It's going to fall on us, it's going to fall on us.' "
"I thought earthquakes don't happen here," Mher added ...
A great laugh line from a 13-year-old kid who had seen some frightful tragedies.
- Jim Sweeney
'I didn't think about that story again until 5:04 p.m. on Oct. 17, 1989 . . . '
Twenty years ago today at 5:04 p.m., three friends and I were seated in Section 2, Row 19 of the upper deck at Candlestick Park, right behind (albeit well above) home plate. This put us directly under a cement canopy around the rim of the ballpark.
I mention that because five years or so earlier, as a greenhorn reporter in
I didn't think about that story again until 5:04 p.m. Oct. 17, 1989 when that overhang began flapping like a bedsheet in the breeze - and the world suddenly felt like a porch swing. As my friends held on to the seats in front of them and studied what was happening out on the field, I was looking overhead. I remember thinking, calmly, "I should have updated that story."
As it turns out, Feinstein and the city had indeed found the money to seismically upgrade that overhang. It's one of those rare moments when I can say that a mundane municipal government budgetary decision probably saved my life - and those of many others.
Which is one of the things that often gets overlooked in coverage about the 1989 earthquake. Yes, the quake broke the
But what's amazing is that only 67 people died. That is remarkable. (If you recall, first news reports claimed deaths would be in the "thousands.")
The fact is that thousands of lives were probably saved in 1989 - and would be saved again today if the same thing happened -- because of tough seismic laws, design rules and hard-fought budgetary battles that someone probably at tought at the time was boring. Maybe even some reporter.
But at 5:04 p.m. that day, I appreciated those meetings and the decisions that came from them, or at least one. And that's a story that's probably worth updating.
- Paul Gullixson
First storm of the season puts us all to the test
Winter fell on a Tuesday this year, and it fell with a vengeance, exposing all those hidden places in life -- in Sonoma County -- where we're most vulnerable.
Trees. Roads. Power poles. They succumbed at their weakest joints, leaving blackouts, traffic jams and new lakes in their wake.
At one point today, this was the count: nine county roads flooded, 2,215 customers out of power, one sewing store at Coddingtown Mall severely damaged. Nearly 3 inches of rain fell in some areas.
Our rainy season has been like this in recent years. In like a lion, out like a damp lamb.
Will it be the same this year?
Construction crews had been preparing for days, rushing to put up tarps. Vineyard workers scrambled to bring in the last of the harvest. Police officers and road crews broke out the foul weather gear.
No matter the warnings, such abrupt shifts in seasons always seem to find many of us unprepared. Patio umbrellas, barbecues and the toys of summer, which should have been stored away suddenly become the playthings of weather -- objects to be chased down and secured in our slippers.
For some of us, our embarrassments were even more visible to the neighbors. We ran out to retrieve the newspaper, coats draped over our heads because we couldn't find a blasted umbrella anywhere, only to see the sprinklers hissing at us.
Moments later, grandma was on the phone gently reminding us that we had not cleaned out her gutters. But not to worry. She's sure it will be fine.
My 6-year-old was the first to notice at breakfast that a section of our back fence had come undone at one post. The fence section waved at me with every gust of wind.
This caused a commotion as, despite my assurances, Clara refused to finish her piano practice until she was certain that our Sheltie, Cody, was secure in our backyard.
So I was back outside in my Dearfoams, calling for the family dog only to discover that he had, indeed, escaped -- not through the broken fence but by a side gate blown open by the wind.
Bedlam ensued. Clara cried. Christopher ran for the scooter. Mom pleaded for calm. Fortunately, calm prevailed amid this storm among a storm.
With my wife's assurances, we left the front door open and stepped back. Sure enough, within minutes that wet mass of fur my children claim as a family member, and my wife seems to understand on some visceral level, strolled home on his own. A first.
He looked up at me with an expression that said, "Yes, I love a good chase. But let's be reasonable in a time like this."
Yes, we all must make sacrifices.
He was swiftly covered in towels and embraces and rewarded with a trip to school in the mini-van.
"I am sure it is a great mistake always to know enough to go in when it rains," wrote Adeline Knapp, a Bay Area journalist, more than 100 years ago. "One may keep snug and dry by such knowledge, but one misses a world of loveliness."
True enough. But there will be time enough to explore that world, that world of rain and the poetry it shakes loose, after we fix the fence -- and find that stupid umbrella.
-- Paul Gullixson
Apparently time has sweetened Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's
view of a bill that tightens the definition of honey for the purpose of
commercial sales in
At a news conference in July, he blasted AB 1216 by Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, as an example of wasted time and effort while hinting that perhaps it was time to return to a part-time Legislature.
"Well, it's obviously very sad that we are in the biggest financial crisis and we are way overdue to get the budget done and we face a $26 billion deficit," Schwarzenegger said at the time, "and I ask over and over and over the legislators upstairs to just focus on the budget and here they are, they're debating over the definition of honey."
Schwarzenegger also ripped bout measures to end the practice of tail docking (cutting the tails of dairy cattle) and to create a state commission to help blueberry farmers market their crop. But on Sunday, even as he vetoed dozens of bill, he signed all three.
For the record, Evans said the bill is intended to address concerns about deceptively labeled and mislabeled products and to ensure that products using other sweeteners and compounds aren't labeled as honey.
-- Jim Sweeney
PD survey shows majority of residents won't get the vaccination or are uncertain. Click here to take survey.
Tedd Peterson of Cloverdale writes, "Parents who do not have their children immunized pose a major threat to the public at large, especially to those who have weak immune systems, those who are already ill, and those who are elderly. One wonders what they will do should their own children come down with communicable diseases. Rely on prayer?"
Mickey Cooke of Glen Ellen said, "As one who had every disease children got in the 1930's ... before good immunizations, I can tell you that sending an unprotected child to school endangers all others. Polio, whooping cough, measles and chickenpox were endemic in Marin County when I grew up. What's with these folks who are afraid of immunization?"
Dan Hayes of Petaluma wrote: "Yesterday morning, all three network morning shows were pushing the vaccination story, at the same time slot and that kind of in-sync reporting always makes me leary. Felt manufactured and over hyped."
Finally, someone who declined to leave a name wrote: "How can you trust a government that will turn you against your neighbor. Do they know best for you . . . or THEM?"
These are just four of the 80 comments left at the end of our most recent online survey, this one about vaccinations and the H1N1 strain, otherwise known as the swine flu.
As we noted in today's editorial, the survey found that just 45 percent of Press Democrat letter writers and other readers plan on getting an H1N1 flu shot. Thirty-five percent say they won't get the shot, while 20 percent are uncertain what they plan to do.
To take the survey yourself, see the results and/or read the comments click here. To be included in future surveys, just send an e-mail to me at paul.gullixson@pressdemocrat.com
- Paul Gullixson
Obama should not have been so quick to accept this award
I was at an economic outlook breakfast meeting at the Vineyard Creek Hyatt in
"For what?" I asked. "He hasn't done anything, yet."
"For diplomacy," a friend and office colleague said.
He then tried to explain the rationale as best he could: That Obama has energized the world and "strengthened international diplomacy."
I would argue that most of the international diplomacy that has occurred in his presidency has been, ironically enough, by his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her husband, he of North Korea handshake-for-prisoners fame.
But even so, if that was the criterion, "they should have given the Nobel to the voters who elected him," I said.
I hoped, for the president's sake and for the integrity of the prize itself, that Obama might find the fortitude to turn it down.
Of course, that wasn't going to happen. Who turns down a Nobel?
A couple of hours ago, Obama said he would fly to
accept the Nobel Peace Prize as a "call to action, a call for all nations to confront the challenges of the 21st century."
Let me make clear that I like President Obama, for the most part. Our newspaper endorsed him, and, given the extraordinary circumstances of our time, he has done a respectable job in his first nine months in office in responding to our domestic economic concerns. But he has done little on the global stage. This has to be the first Nobel Peace Prize awarded for what someone is going to do. Certainly, setting out to solve the problems of the 21st century is an ambitious agenda. But if objectives and dreams were prize-worthy, we would all be in Oslo come December.
I hate to say it, but this takes the luster off the Nobel. It also will make things more difficult for Obama, I predict.
Furthermore, what is left for this 48-year-old to achieve. The Heisman Trophy?
More than two years ago, the city of
Now, the city has started looking for a partner to help develop the site. But it's still not clear what is going to become of it.
When the city's Redevelopment Agency bought it in March 2007 - for $3 million - the economy was very different. The thinking at the time was that the building could be coverted into office, retail or housing space - or some combination of all three.
But the market for all of those components has changed dramatically since then.
Nevertheless, after holding off its search for a while, Redevelopment Agency officials last month sent out a letter (an RFQ "request for qualifications") seeking a developer with the expertise to turn the building into something Santa Rosa wants. Responses are due back by Nov. 12.
(To see the abundance of materials city officials is passing on to would-be developers, click here. I counted 78 documents in all, including a link to a virtual tour of the building. It's worth watching if only to see the panoramic views atop this five-story building.)
The problem is that everyone has their own idea of what to do with the AT&T building, and history shows that these projects can become "Christmas trees," on which everyone hangs their own idea (think Railroad Square project) or something that ends up getting bogged down by debate and waffling (think the former White House site.)
Ideas discussed so far during meetings and public workshops include:
I suggest we also discuss what shouldn't go on the site, including: a parking structure, a coffee shop, a bookstore (as much as I like these last two, we've already got plenty) and, most of all, a bank, investment or mortgage company.
Please, no more downtown. Nobody every said, "Let's go downtown and window shop at the financial institutions."
Yet, that's a lot of what pedestrians get when they visit the Courthouse Square area.
It's time for something different.
- Paul Gullixson
Should school libraries be exempted from budget cuts under consideration by the Santa Rosa school board?
Recent Comments