The level of nastiness in the Sonoma County supervisorial race is hitting new lows for distortions -- and new highs in spending.
The county has never seen anything like this in terms of hit pieces and blatant lies.
Take a look at some of the recent mailers sent out by the independent expenditure committee being funded primarily by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and other labor groups. The group has spent in excess of $150,000 trying to get their candidates Shirlee Zane and Rue Furch elected to the Board of Supervisors. They're doing this largely through attacks ads directed at Sharon Wright and Efren Carrillo.
One shows an aerial photo of a clear-cut forest. The mailer states "The developers backing Efren Carrillo want to clear cut Sonoma County forests."
The ad refers to the proposed 19,650-acre Preservation Ranch project which includes planting 1,800 acres of vineyards across 30 square miles near Annapolis. No clear-cutting is proposed. On the contrary, sponsors of the project are seeking approval under the very timber-conversion rules approved by county Planning Commissioner Rue Furch, Carrillo's election opponent. This important fact is missing from this campaign ad.
The ad also states that "Carrillo has refused to take a position on the project, saying he is waiting for a report to be issued .<TH>.<TH>."
That report happens to be the environmental impact report which will trigger the county's review process. Furch also has refused to take a position on the project for basically the same reason.
Another mailer is going after Sharon Wright, who is running against Shirlee Zane for the 3rd District Supervisorial seat. The mailer contends that Wright, while on the board of Memorial Hospital, "presided over the closing of vital services" such as the psychiatric center.
The fact is the decision was made after Wright had left the board.
Efren Carrillo has responded to the hit pieces against him with his own attack mailer titled "FurchFacts.com" which focuses on Furch's delay in paying her property taxes.
In an editorial on Thursday, we call on candidates who are supported by these kinds of tactics to repudiate them. We're not holding our breath.
We're interested in hearing from those who have received these kinds of mailers.
- Paul Gullixson









Recent Comments